Re: Another question re: Siitaa-Maata
From the Bhakti List Archives
• November 12, 1998
---------- > From: Krishna Susarla> To: bhakti@lists.best.com > Subject: Another question re: Siitaa-Maata > Date: Thursday, November 12, 1998 6:39 PM > > Dear devotees, > > The recent discussion on the Raamaayana stirred up a memory of a story I > heard long ago. The story went like this: When Lord Vishnu incarnated as > Raama, Lakshmii went down to Earth as Vedavati to perform tapasya and > meditation on the Lord. While she was there, Raavana happened by and > attempted to disturb her meditation. For this, she cursed him (that She > would be the cause of his downfall) and then incarnated as Siitaa. > Apparently, She appeared as a baby in a lotus flower found by Raavana in > Lanka. Remembering the curse, Raavana gave the baby to Varuna, who then gave > her to Mother Earth, who presented her to Janaka when the latter was > performing his plough-sacrifice. > This is an interesting coincidence. I was just watching bits and pieces of the Telugu sampUrna rAmAyanam just prior to checking e-mail, and happened to watch the depiction of the incident described above. I would concur that this incident is not mentioned in Srimad Ramayanam. While I do not know the source of this story, it is my understanding (based on my own recollection of this popular tale, the movie only touches on the incident) that this Vedavati is not identified with Lakshmi, but is actually the Maya-Sita of our previous discussion. In fact, if I recall the popular story surrounding the sthala purAnam of thirumalai correctly, Naradar reminds Srinivasan and Lakshmi that Vedavati had become Maya-Sita in order to fulfill the threat that she had made to Ravanan. He also reminds Them that this Maya-Sita had asked Ramar to protect and marry her, since she had truly felt the separation that the "Real" Sita Piratti would have felt for Him. Sri Ramar tells her that as He was committed only to one wife in this AvathAran, He would have to marry her in another one. Hence, Vedavati was born as Padmavati and married Srinivasan. Whether Vedavati is Lakshmi or Maya-Sita, since her character does not appear within Valmiki's Ramayanam, as stated before, it would be very difficult for traditional SriVaishnavas to accept her role in the story, nor, I would imagine, within the context of shastra. adiyEn, Mohan
- Next message: Madhavakkannan V: "Naanmugan Thiruvandhaadhi- 5 - "there is no fear for me any more""
- Previous message: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: "Re: Another question re: Siitaa-Maata"
- Maybe in reply to: Krishna Susarla: "Another question re: Siitaa-Maata"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]