srInivAsa perumAl's Urdhva pundravantham ...Another version of the purANam ...
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 15, 1997
Here is another version of the reason as to why the thirunAmam on the Lord of thiruvEnkadam is what it is. I will try to do my best. Long ago, the archakAs of the temple at thirumalai had a great influence and power as to the way the Temple and its resources were controlled. Consequently, some people overextended/abused this power. During one such occasion, the chief archakar at the temple ordered that his son be brought on parade using the Temple's elephants immediately following his yagnObhavItham ceremony. The King of the region, a staunch devotee of the Lord, and a great patron of the Temple was infuriated by this action, and ordered all the archakAs and their families to be beheaded, so such abusive traits may not be passed on. Several people were killed. One pregnant lady, a wife of one of the archakAs, went and hid in the Temple's well in the madapaLLi (kitchen). (You will notice that most old temples have a well for the madapaLLi's water supply, and that these have a spiral staircase along the wall leading all the way to the bottom of the well). She waited there for the furor to end, surviving on whatever she managed to carry with her. Once the chaos subsided, she came out and mingled with the service class, so that she would not be recognized and that her child be spared. In the meantime, Lord srInivAsA, was apalled at the King's attitude, and closed His doors to the public. He spelled a curse that His sannidhi would be accessible to no one, and He will not provide a darshan to any more devotees. No amount of effort would force the doors of the "bangAra vAsal" to open. He also cursed that the King would see the end of his Kingdom. Devotees still poured in, and unable to capture a glimpse of theLord, would offer "thayir sAtham" or curd rice at the doors of the "bangAra vAsal", a tradition that is followed even today. Finally, His anger relented, and He said to the people, that only the surviving archakA child would be able to open the door. The people searched till they found the child. Fearing for their life, the mother denied acceptance of their true identity, but finally, the people of the kingdom requested her to let the child go, as he is the only one who is capable of appeasing the Lord's anger. The 11 year orld srInivAsa dIkshithar was brought on procession to the temple. Whence some people expressed sentiments such as - "He is not even a Brahmin, and even if he was, he did not have his yagnObhavItham ceremony yet !" The child unable to comprehend the situation, asked his mother - "Amma - enna amma paNNaNum ?" (What should I do). Not knowing what to reply, the mother asked the child to bath in the "pushkariNi" and then go and take some thayir sAtham for the Lord to eat. The child took a dip, and when he came out of the water - he had a yagnObhavItha m across his body ! He then went into the temple with the temple guard and laid his hands on the doors, when the doors swung open. The Guard to the temple went in and lit the lights (Even today, the guard is the first person to see the Lord's face at day break). The child asked him what he should do? The person said - "perumAlukku nethikku idanum". The child did not know what it meant, as he was always surrounded by shUdrAs all his life, and at the description of the guard, he took a hand full of "pachchai kalpUram" and laid it on the Lord's forehead. It came out wide and large. Hence the current practice. Later on, when he presented the curd rice to the Lord, nothing happened. He then requested perumAl to come and partake in the offering, for if He did not, then the public would condemn the child. At which, the Lord came down and took a handful. He then offered the very next handful to the child and said that from now on His archakAs would get the first offering of the prasAdam after it is offered to the Lord, a practice followed till date at Tirupathi. Om namO srIman nArAyanAya namaha. Raja Krishnasamy raja@cyberdude.com
- Next message: RANGASWAMY_at_plh.af.mil: "(no subject)"
- Previous message: Vijay_Srinivasan_at_praxair.com: "Recent Postings"
- Next in thread: Raja Krishnasamy: "Re: srInivAsa perumAl's Urdhva pundravantham ...Another version of the purANam ..."
- Maybe reply: Raja Krishnasamy: "Re: srInivAsa perumAl's Urdhva pundravantham ...Another version of the purANam ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]