Re: 'Akshara' etc. in the BhG
From the Bhakti List Archives
• April 11, 2002
Martin Gansten writes: > In general, I find that Ramanuja's eisegesis, particularly of > the BhG, takes the form of exaggeration: overstating a tendency > which is already in the text. (For instance: the BhG clearly > advocates karmayoga over jnanayoga. Ramanuja overstates this > case to the point where jnanayoga is said to be possible only > for disincarnate beings!) Martin, While I agree with your overall observation, can you point out where Ramanuja says this about jnAna-yoga? As I have understood the bhAshya, Ramanuja only says that success in jnAna-yoga is difficult and only possible for a very advanced aspirant, but it is nonetheless possible. My take on Ramanuja's Gitabhashya is that I find it to be the most careful reading of the text. Ramanuja always takes into account the context and comments appropriately (e.g., the many different usages of the word 'brahman' in the Gita). I also think his interpretation rings psychologically true in terms of the process of yoga. Yes, there are a few places where I have to admit that I would be hard pressed to convince an impartial observer that Ramanuja's interpretation is not without difficulty (e.g., the different meditations on the ParamAtman outlined for the three different aspirants in Chapter 8). At the same time, as you say, in each situation the tendency toward these interpretations is there in the text and it certainly would be hasty to conclude that Ramanuja is wrong. As my friend Krishna Kalale/Kashyap once remarked, of the three classical commentators s on the Gita, Sankaracharya is the boldest (reading monistic Advaita in an avowedly theistic text), Ramanuja's is closest to the intention of the original, and Madhva's is the most theistic (reading references to the ParamAtman wherever the jIva is actually intended, i.e., the first six chapters). aDiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan, Mani -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Martin Gansten: "Exegesis and eisegesis"
- Previous message: Ramkumar Gopalaswamy: ""eisegesis" == "upapatti" and "exegesis" == "anupapatti" ?"
- Maybe in reply to: Martin Gansten: "'Akshara' etc. in the BhG"
- Next in thread: Martin Gansten: "Re: 'Akshara' etc. in the BhG"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]