Re: JIvAtma SAkshAtkAram as a pre-requisite to ParamAtma SAkshAtkAram
From the Bhakti List Archives
• April 8, 2002
--- In bhakti-list@y..., Anand K Karalapakkamwrote: > In SrImad RTS, SwAmi DESikan in the 9th Ch on different > upAyas (upAya-vibhAga adhikAra), crisply highlights the important > characteristics of Karma, Jn~Ana and Bhakti Yogas. In the > concluding part of swAmi's note on Jn~Ana yoga, it is stated that > jIvAtma-darSana is essential for starting bhakti yoga, with the > analogy of a RatNa inside a cloth. I would modify this statement slightly but significantly. I am not certain what Sri Desika says specifically in Srimad Rahasya Traya Saara, but he is very clear on this issue in his commentary on Sri Yamuna's Gitarthasangraha. The position taken there is that while ultimately, the vision of the blissful individual self (jIvAtma-sAkshAtkAra) is definitely prefatory to success in bhakti-yoga and consequent vision of the ParamAtman, such a vision of the individual self is not a *necessary* condition to *beginning* the process of bhakti-yoga. jIvAtma-sAkshAtkAra may occur on the way, but one need not have had total success in karma-yoga or jnAna-yoga before practicing bhakti-yoga in its full form. Sri Desika here draws a distinction between bhakti-yoga itself and para-bhakti, the high state of the contemplative devotional experience when one actually achieves a ceaseless mental calling to mind of the ParamAtman's form. When someone starts bhakti-yoga, he or she may not have had any success in the evenness of mind or the experience of the individual self that constitutes the crown of karma-yoga and jnAna-yoga. However, by the time the bhakti-yogi has arrived at the state of para-bhakti (high bhakti), the vision of the self would have been accomplished as a side effect of the practice of *this* yoga, and not necessarily out of the practice of karma-yoga or jnAna-yoga in their principal elements. Sri Desika makes these comments on Gitarthasangraha (GAS) 25: * Atma-dRSTes trayo 'py ete yoga-dvAreNa sAdhakAH //25// * Any one of these three yogas (karma-yoga, jnAna-yoga, * or bhakti-yoga) can achieve the vision of the individual * self. I do not have Sri Desika's GAS Raksha handy, but I recall the essence of what he says. He himself brings up the question of how bhakti-yoga can achieve the vision of the individual self since it is generally thought that such a vision is a preliminary for the commencement of bhakti-yoga. Sri Desika says that quite clearly, one can engage in forms of bhakti-yoga without having a vision of the self, and that the vision of the self is only propaedeutic to para-bhakti, a very advanced stage of bhakti-yoga. One can engage in common devotional practices with sincere dedication, perform one's daily and occasional religious rites as worship of God, and attempt to contemplate on God directly, and be called a bhakti-yogi. He cites a sentence from Vedarthasangraha in support of this view. For the distinction between the bhakti-yogi and one who is engaged in para-bhakti, well, the Gita itself makes such a distinction when Krishna teaches in chapter 18 that "such a yogi attains para-bhakti to Me" (mad-bhaktim labhate parAm). Drawing further on the various aspirants described in Chapter 12 of the Gita and Sri Ramanuja's bhAshya, Sri Desika points out that such a bhakti-yogi very will achieve the vision of the self as an outgrowth of this yoga, since bhakti-yoga contains jnAna-yoga and karma-yoga as elements (vide GAS 24 "trayAnAm api yogAnAM tribhir anyonya-saMgamaH" -- the three yogas are interdependent). I was quite pleasantly surprised when I first read about this take on bhakti-yoga. To be sure I had understood this correctly, I brought up the issue with Dr. N.S. Anantha Rangacharya. He said while many people are not aware of this aspect of bhakti-yoga, Desika's comments here are absolutely clear and that this "was not a matter of dispute within the tradition". What this means is that: (a) When beginning their spiritual quest, some people engage in karma-yoga, which is selfless action performed as worship of God, with an understanding of the true nature of the individual self. This action takes the form of active compassion, charity, austerity, visiting holy places, scriptural study, yajna, etc. (b) Some others engage in jnAna-yoga, which is contemplative analysis of the nature of the individual self in relation to the world and God. JnAna-yoga is essentially attempts at meditation on the nature of the self consequent to conquering the senses and bodily impulses. (c) For both of these, an introductory understanding of the nature of God are required. God is seen as the supreme benefactor and the Supreme Self, and is worshipped for success in yoga, but is not necessarily viewed as the supreme goal. All this depends on the mindset of the aspirant. (d) Success in karma-yoga and jnAna-yoga leads to the vision of the individual self (jIvAtma-sAkshAtkAra). Karma-yoga can be a gateway to jnAna-yoga, and then subsequently to jIvAtma-sAkshAtkAra, or it can lead directly to jIvAtma-sAkshAtkAra because of the element of knowledge that is fundamental to its practice. (e) Between karma-yoga and jnAna-yoga the Gita counsels aspirants to pursue karma-yoga because of its relative ease and greater likelihood of failure. (f) Once the vision of the self is secured, the aspirant has obviously achieved some measure of success in yoga, and has perceived the self in its proper place -- i.e., that it is truly different from the body, and that it is 'Sesha' to God. The aspirant then naturally moves on to loving contemplation of God directly. This contemplation takes on different colors depending on the ultimate goal of the aspirant. (g) Some people may already have an abiding love for God and may not be interested in engaging themselves principally in karma-yoga or jnAna-yoga (see Gita chapter 12). These people engage in a form of bhakti-yoga that does not already have the vision of the self as its basis. Consequently their meditation may not be as firm; yet, with time, they too experience the proper nature of the self as an outgrowth of their bhakti-yoga and are able to ceaselessly envision the Lord. (h) It is to be noted that for all of the above aspirants the daily and occasional religious rites (nitya-naimittika karma) are obligatory and are performed to the best of one's ability as God's worship. (i) One may worship God through bhakti-yoga for three goals: (a) The securing of bodily or material prosperity (aiSvaryArthi, in the Gita 'Arta' and 'arthArthi') (b) To attain a permanent vision of the nature of the individual self (kaivalyArthi or jijnAsu) (c) out of love of the ParamAtman alone (jnAni) Chapters 7 and 8 of the Gita detail these different aspirants and naturally give the highest place of honor to the jnAni, who views success and failure purely in relation to union with God. Incidentally, the so-called 'akshara-upAsaka' of the Gita, mentioned in the 7th, 8th, and 12th chapters, is understood to refer to someone who seeks to permanently experience the bliss of the individual self. This person engages in bhakti-yoga for the sake this experience (the jijnAsu of the 7th chapter). He meditates on God as the akshara for the sake of attaining the jIva as akshara (see Desika's comments on Ramanuja-bhAshya for chapter 8). For this reason he is known as an akshara-upAsaka in Chapter 12. The meditation of the akshara-upAsaka and the jnAni is different in the following manner. Both of them have an understanding of the nature of the individual self vis-a-vis the ParamAtman, but the jnAni's is more advanced. While the akshara-upAsaka meditates principally on the jIva having God as its innermost self, the jnAni meditates principally on God having the jIva as His attribute. (The first is brahma-SarIraka-jIvAtma upAsana, the second is svAtma-viSishTa-brahma upAsana). As Martin has pointed out, Sri Ramanuja mentions that the distinction between these two aspirants is only in the initial stage ("mukha-bhedena" -- see Vedanta Saara). Both are meditating on God, only in different modes. The jnAnis meditation is the more enlightened since he only cares about God, the jIvAtma being incidental. For this reason, the akshara-upAsaka is also sometimes known as a jIvAtma-upAsaka; but the latter term is to be very loosely taken and should be understood in the manner described previously. aDiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan Mani -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: mani2: "Re: JIvAtma SAkshAtkAram as a pre-requisite to ParamAtma SAkshAtkAram"
- Previous message: sadagopan iyengar: "Yes, Prime Minister"
- In reply to: Anand K Karalapakkam: "JIvAtma SAkshAtkAram as a pre-requisite to ParamAtma SAkshAtkAram"
- Next in thread: mani2: "Re: JIvAtma SAkshAtkAram as a pre-requisite to ParamAtma SAkshAtkAram"
- Reply: mani2: "Re: JIvAtma SAkshAtkAram as a pre-requisite to ParamAtma SAkshAtkAram"
- Reply: mani2: "Re: JIvAtma SAkshAtkAram as a pre-requisite to ParamAtma SAkshAtkAram"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]