RE: 'Akshara' etc. in the BhG
From the Bhakti List Archives
• April 4, 2002
Dear Krishna, >It is surprising to find that the 15.16's axara purusha is made out to be the Jiva, >when the Uttama purusha himself states in no uncertain terms that 'ksharaH >sarvANi bhUtAni'. It is not possible to make this phrase 'sarvANi bhUtAni' out >to the material/matter of this world, for, in many other instances in the Gita itself, >this phrase is used to denote sentient beings As you yourself point out, 'similarity of adjectives does not prove much'. The fundamental meaning of 'bhuta' is that which has come into being or been created; and this may refer to sentient as well as insentient entities. The BhG in at least one place (7.6) defines 'bhuta' as a combination of the two (etadyonini bhutani...). In 15.16-18, the word is certainly used to denote either 'creatures' in the empirical sense (i.e., bodies) or material elements (mahabhuta), as it would go absolutely against the grain of the text -- and, indeed, of all vedantic texts -- to describe the self as destructible (kshara). Matter, as you rightly point out, is not really destructible either; but it forms are, in contrast to the self. On the other hand, while a single adjective may be used to refer to different entities, a long list of identical or near-identical attributes narrows the scope considerably. 'The dark one' may refer to any number of persons; 'the dark, four-armed, yellow-robed, discus-holding, serpent-resting one' not so... The epithets in 2.24-25 and 12.3 are surely too similar to leave an unprejudiced mind in doubt of their common referent. To describe the self as akshara, and as the object of meditation, is more in keeping with the tenor of the BhG than reading references to Sri and her worship into the text (where they are never mentioned). Ramanuja Dasa, MG -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Krishna Kashyap: "RE: 'Akshara' etc. in the BhG"
- Previous message: Krishna K: "RE: 'Akshara' etc. in the BhG"
- Maybe in reply to: Martin Gansten: "'Akshara' etc. in the BhG"
- Next in thread: Krishna K: "Re: 'Akshara' etc. in the BhG"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]