Re: Dharmi jnanam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 24, 1999
Dear Bhagavatas, Namo narayana. In February of 1999 I had posted a note in which I used the statement "our load of karma is such that we are almost one with inanimate matter." I interpreted the statement as saying that even the dharmi jnanam is contracted. It was brought to my attention, by Sri. Madhavakkannan (in a kind manner), that maybe I had misunderstood the concept; I posted a note acknowledging that I may be wrong, but was unsure. However, recently, while glancing through Sri. RamAnujAcArya's vedArtha-sangraha, I found that my initial interpretation of the statement, referred to above, may not be improper; I am now the posting this information. I would be grateful if some of the more learned bhagavatas can elaborate on this issue. VedArtha sangraha: Verse 51. The answer follows. For us who hold this conception of brahman and the Veda, the criticism has no force. Consciousness, we maintain, though an inherent attribute of the individual is subject to real contraction and expansion by the force of karma. Thus the difficulty urged is eliminated. For you, consciousness is the substantive nature of the self and not its attribute. You do not admit either contraction or expansion. In our account, concealing factors like karma, bring about the non-origination of the spread of consciousness. If the nature of nescience is to veil, nescience, the agency that viels, must be, as urged before, destructive of the essential nature of consciousness itself. According to us karma, in the form of nescience, brings about the contraction of the consciousness that is an eternal attribute of the substantive nature of the Atman. By virtue of this contraction arises the wrong attitude to the self, taking it for gods, men, or any other empirical creature. Please note in this verse Sri. RamAnujAcArya is answering an Advaitic objection (criticism.) There are two important points to be taken from this short verse:(Please note this is a neophyte's (Sri. venkat) interpretation of a translated verse, so please excuse any errors.) 1. The set of Sentences starting with "For us no force" to the sentence ending in "Thus the difficulty eliminated" are beautiful. Sri. RamAnujAcArya is saying that advaita and Vis'istAdvaita differ in some fundamental premises, the criticisms offered by the advaitan are inappropriate, given that vis'istAdvaita uses a different set of premises to draw a valid argument. 2. "According to us karma, in the form of nescience, brings about the contraction of the consciousness that is an eternal attribute of the substantive nature of the Atman. By virtue of this contraction arises the wrong attitude to the self, taking it for gods, men, or any other empirical creature." Adiyen ramanuja dasan, Venkat KrishNarpaNam
- Next message: Sadagopan: "Swami Desikan Home Pages"
- Previous message: narasimha.prasad_at_ucdmc.ucdavis.edu: "Re: What is a billion dollars anyway?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]