Fwd: Sri Ranganatha temple
From the Bhakti List Archives
Unknown Sender • Tue Sep 21 1999 - 13:29:54 PDT
Dear Bhagavatas This is a mail posted by me in the malolan net. Since Sriman Kalale had posted Sri Dileepan's note, I am posting here by way of clarification. Hope this clarifies. Let us put the matter behind us because there is no reference to Sri Ranganatha Temple in U.S.A but it concerned solely with the numerous appeals being received from India for financial support to various temples in India. Dasoham Anbil Ramaswamy
attached mail follows:
In a message dated 9/21/1999 12:15:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time, you wrote- << Another question that we have to deal with is the price tag. Why spend millions of dollars on temples here in the U.S. while many of the divya desams in India are in disrepair. For a fraction of the cost of building one temple here we can maintain many temples in India. >> Support to the Ranganatha Temple under the able leadership of Paramaikanti sArvabhouman Dr. Venkat is unquestionable. There can be no two opinions about this and I do not think anyone suggested what you are mentioning above. In fact, it is public knowledge that the very people who were not in favor of Ranganatha temple at one stage started supporting AFTER Azhagiyasinghar conferred the honorofic on Dr. Venkat!. Nor is it a question of Ranganatha Temple here vs temples in India. You have mentioned- " In any case, renovations are happening and we may support these activities as much as wecan. But let us not make this out into a competition between building Sri Ranganatha temple and renovation of temples in India." It is heartening to note that renovations are happening. As stated above, the question of making out a competition was not suggested by anyone, so far as my knowledge goes. You wrote- "One problem about sending money to temple in India is who are you going to send it to. Even if we have responsible people in cities to send it to how many times are they going to visit these temples to oversee the proper utilization of the funds" This is precisely what was projected in my note. You wrote- "Anyway, Sri Ranganatha temple is the one and only Sri Vaishnava temple in the U.S. where you can worship without any mental reservations. It is our duty now to see to it that it gets built." I cannot agree more with you on this. You wrote- "Therefore, opposition to SriRanaganatha temple which stands for the most basic principle for SriVaishnavas, is not something that must surprise us. But perumaaL has brought together a lot of devotees under the leadership of Sri Venkat Swami. Let us not feel discouraged by the criticisms. If we work together with full faith in our AchAryAs we shall succeed". Nobody seems to have opposed the Sri Ranganatha temple project. Let us not see a red rag where there is none. Dasoham Anbil Ramaswamy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Srimate Sri Laksminrisimha Divya Paduka Sevaka Srivan Satakopa Sri Narayana Yatindra Mahadesikaya Nama
- Next message: muralidhar rangaswamy: "Tirunakshatram of Swami Desikan and Lord Srinivasa"
- Previous message: Krishna Kalale: "FW: Sri Ranganatha temple"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]