Re: Re. Recent Discussions
From the Bhakti List Archives
Unknown Sender • Mon Sep 20 1999 - 22:10:21 PDT
Srimathe Ramanujaya Nama:
While I appreciate Sri.Vijayaragavan's concern for amiability between
Both kalais of our sampradayam,
I wish to point out some of his observations, which seems to me to be
very wild and would result in
Affecting our very sampradayam.
I am a Tenkali Srivaishnava by practice and as per my Acharya lineage, I
have great reverence for Vadakalai sampradayam not just because part of
my family members are followers of Vadakalai but also due to the fact
that I learned some Swami Vedanthacharys?s Works and always pray him
while thinking of my Acharya paramparai as one of my the acharyas.
(this is the true position of most of the tenkalais who respect Swami
Desikan as an Acharya who saved our samopradayam in crucial time from
Advaitis and other people. (Remember Satadhusini episode, srirangam koil
episode etc..) in many of our Tenkali temples Sri Desikan sanndathi is
existing Swami adoring Tenkali thirunamam. We should attempt to know
the history of the events before passing any judgements.
Sri.Vijaya Ragavan was advocating that we should start practicing
sathumarai of both kalais in every temple and only such temples deserve
any donation.
This is a very serious issue and any judgements on above lines are
highly debatable.
May be we are passing judgements because we are materially comfortable
and Ernest and Old people come to us for donations for any kaimkaryams
back at home.
At first let me say that we are not any great people to make any
amendments in the Nitya kramam of any temple. It is better to leave the
Nitya kamams as it is and focus on building personal relationships among
Srivaishnavas irresectivce of kalai differences and teach our children
to respect all Sri vaishnava Elders.
We should remember that Sri Emberumarar had more than 60 important
acharyas and as the sampradaym had toflourish only thorough the Acharya
lineage, there bound to be differences in the Nitya krama practices from
one lineage to other. How many are we going to change?
As a person who had dwelled in divyadesams many years, sometimes I
feel that it is better for one to feel about their own sampradayams . at
least it makes them to come forward and do kaimkaryams . In their later
part of their life such young ones will get maturity and understand the
real perspective of Kimkaryam.
Donating only to those temples where dual sathumarai is followed is not
tenable. The tamil word (ISAI) means that there is some level of
congruence in recital. (isainthu)
I suggest some one to listen to those temples where both sathumrai is
recited. I am sure that it would not be a good recital. I have witnessed
it in places like Melkote , Bangalore etc..
One would immediately decide that either one should be practiced so that
it could be a good recital. If such is the feeling of our mundane ear,
think of Emperuman who is witnessing all this daily. How badly He would
feel.
There are really many Srivaishnava temples which needs not just money
and also physical work, time etc, people like us should not see which
sampradayam is followed and who is raising funds and insist them to
change their methodology of worship for donation.
In the light of our Emberumanar, we should protect those temples only on
the lines of sastras and sampradaysms which are followed since ages.
Dasan
K.M.Narayanan
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer.
- Next message: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: ""SRI VEDANTA DESIKA SABHA""
- Previous message: Madhavakkannan V: "Sri Vedanta Desikan Home page on Swamy's Thirunakshathram.."
- Maybe in reply to: Vijayaraghavan Srinivasan: "Re. Recent Discussions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
