Re: What is a billion dollars anyway?
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 17, 1999
Dear Bhagavathas: I cannot agree more with the statements Sri Mani makes regarding the need for jettisoning divisive practices and honoring both Swamy Desikan and Sri ManavALa mAmunigaL. In fact, in the current day tradition, I have seen only a few isolated instances where the divisiveness has been brought to the fore. Most prominent current day Acharyas/scholars from both kalais have made a concerted effort to accord due recognition and respect to the contributions of both swami maNavALa mAmunigaL and dEsikan to our rich heritage, whose significance (of contributions) cannot be overstated. Sri Mani wrote: > > > > But one must consider, no temple in > > India recites both saaRRumuRais. All Vadakalai temples > > (handful though they may be) recite only vadakalai > > saaRRumuRai and all the thenkalai temples recite only > > thenkalai saaRRumuRai. > > a) During my last trip to Melkote, I was told by a knowledgable > Melkote local that both saaRRumuRais are recited there. > I don't know if this is the case all the time, but there is > precedent for such a practice. > > b) Is it good to continue propagating divisive practices, > even if they are practiced in India? In other words, is > there anything fundamentally wrong in honoring both > Swami Sri Desika and Sri Maanmunigal during saaRRumuRai? > Sri Dileepan wrote: > Just imagine, you will be leaving behind Sri Rangam for > our children and their children. How many of them will > visit India and visit Sri Rangam, let alone the other > temples that are in bad shape. No doubt many of these > temples need funding even for nithya ArAdhanai. But, > is it not those who are from these villages and the > locals who must take the primary responsibility for > this? Similarly, Sri Rangam of USA is our village. > It is our responsibility to see that funding is > available at this crucial stage. A completed Sri > Rangam of USA will probably be the only authentic > Sri Vaishnava temple our grand children may ever visit. Another important point to recognize is that while we are willing to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to build a SrI ranganAtha temple in New York, which is an admirable notion by itself, we tend to be far less willing to give even smaller amounts (say a few thousand dollars) to support divya dEsams in India. In this context, it is necessary to recognize that while a temple in New York or Houston or San Jose is a valuable resource to the local populace, equating such temples to a SrI rangam or kAnchipuram or thiruvEngadam is both incorrect and inaccurate. For such comparisons ignore the historical facts that support archAvatharam and the inherent divinity built into each of 106 divya dEsams. Nothing will even come close to replicating the experience of being in the presence of namberumAL or thiruvEngaDamuDeyAn. Such comparisons ignore the need for anushTanic and spiritual purity (almost impossible to replicate livng in the USA) that form the substratum to provide a permanent basis for perumAL's archAvathAram in the divyadEsams. The inherent materialism and the accompanying compromises that are integrated into our lives in the west invariably tend to detract from the purity of our notions and the sanctity of our actions built on such a framework. Ultimately, if we truly want to help serve the cause of Sri VaishNavam, I believe that we should open our hearts and purse strings to supporting the existing divyadEsams (in India) as much as we may want to do for local (and self accretive) efforts. And my experience in this regard has been disappointing, in that, support for divya dEsam causes in India often produce rather lukewarm responses while that for local efforts, which are many orders of magnitude more expensive, seem to find relatively better financial backing. This is not to say we should not build temples locally. To the contrary, if we build temples and make a commitment to make these temples conduits for funding development/maintenance of divya desam temples, we may have found a just calling for our efforts. Azhwaar EmberumAnAr Jeeyar thiruvaDigaLE sharaNam sridhar
- Next message: Sadagopan: "Sri Mani Varadarajan's two postings on guidelines related to Fund raising for Sri VaishNavite causes Here and for Indian Temples"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: What is a billion dollars anyway?"
- In reply to: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: What is a billion dollars anyway?"
- Next in thread: M.A.alwar ph 3444975 mall: "Re: What is a billion dollars anyway?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]