Re: Vibhava lokas
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 8, 1999
Dear Srikanth, Some excerpts of our discussion: I wrote: > Mani, the existence of the VishNu lOka is > unmistakable according to the > pAncarAtra texts and also in the vEdas. e.g., > 1. "na tatra suryObhAti, na candra tArakam ...": > In that lOka of > vishNu, there are no suns, moons, and stars. You wrote in reply to my e-mail: > I suggest that the above > description need not be > taken to imply solely the spatio-physical character > of Sri VaikunTham. ( ... deleted for brevity ...) > However, I think that visualization of Paramapadam > as a spatial realm > might be felt to be an aid to meditation. I strongly > suspect that it is in > this sense that the more physical descriptions are > to be rightly viewed. (AdiyEn): While I have to admit I did not understand the intent of some parts of your reply to my e-mail, I suspect that your point is exactly my point. For more clarifications on my views or if your point is that paramapadam is actually only an avasthA (a state of consciousness) and that paramapadam should be viewed as a "spatial realm only for purposes of meditation," please read on. If vaikunTam were avasthA alone, how would you even start describing It? Besides, whose consiousness is it an avasthA of? The paramAtma's or the mukta's? Also, is it only one avasthA or a multitude of avasthAs, and what is the substratum for these avasthAs? While I do agree that the conventional spatial and temporal descriptions that we are used to here on earth do not apply in VaikunTam, some other spatial and temporal coordinates have to be valid in order to even say that the Lord *sits* on the Adisesha, or that VaikunTam in manned on *all four sides* by four pairs of dwArapAlas, or for that matter that the jIvAtma *performed* cAmara service to the Lord. It is for this purpose that VaikunTam is made of a spiritual substance (one of the dravyas according to RAmAnuja) called nitya vibhuthi. One property of a dravya is that it is a substratum for modification (see Desika's definitions in nyAya siddhAn~jana or tattva-mukta-kalApa). VaikunTam exists the way it does because of Lord's nithya and anithya sankalpa. The jIvAtma and (obviously) the paramAtma use time and space to serve and be served respectively without at the same time being conditioned by them. So, to summarize, VaikunTam is definitely a state of a mukta's consciousness, but only to the extent that it (vaikunTam) has become the object of the mukta's knowledge. VaikunTam with all its multitude of avasthAs of streams flowing, of the various jIvAtmas serving the Lord in infinite number of ways, and with an infinite other dynamic occurences is far easier described as a lOka than an avasthA. || sarvam sree krSNArpaNam astu || -- aDiyEn, muraLi kaDAmbi __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
- Next message: Venk Nagarajan: "Discussion on Pursuit of Meterial Wealth"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "meaning of "Vaikuntha""
- Maybe in reply to: Parthasarathy Srinivasan: "Vibhava lokas"
- Next in thread: Sadagopan: "Re: Vibhava lokas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]