Re: Satyabhaamaa
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 5, 1999
I am grateful for the information that Satysbhaamaa is considered a avataara of Bhuumaa devi. . Is there any reference to her in puraaNas other than Srimad Bhaagavatam, or in tamil prabhandams? "Madhavakkannan, Vasudevan" wrote: > > Sri: > > Dear Sri Venkataraman, > > I was told in an upanyasam by Sri Krishna Premi that SathyabhAmA is an > avtaar of BhumA Devi. > > Narayana Narayana > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Venkataraman [SMTP:venkataraman@pacific.net.sg] > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 1999 10:34 PM > > To: bhakti@lists.best.com > > Subject: Satyabhaamaa > > > > jagat-prasuuti-sthiti-naSa hetave namaH | > > > > The ongoing discussion about the concept of RADHA is very > > illuminating indeed. > > > > RukmiNi is an avataara of saakshaat SriH. We also say * rukmiNii > > satyabhaamaabhyaam sahitam kR'SNam aaSraye *. Can somebody explain > > the Satyabhaamaa concept and how she is given equal status with > > RukmiNi as a consort of KR'SNa. > > > > With my humble praNaams at the feet of all bhaagavata SiromaNi-s on > > this list > > > > -- V.M.Sundaram
- Next message: Velukkudi Krishnan: "Periavachan pillai"
- Previous message: Praveena: "Experiencing Swami Desika - 37"
- Maybe in reply to: Venkataraman: "Satyabhaamaa"
- Next in thread: Sadagopan: "Re: Satyabhaamaa"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]