piLLaiyAr
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 11, 1997
Erudite Scholars and members of the list: I have been a passive member of this list for a long time and i have gained a lot of knowledge about our SriVaishnava culture from the postings. My knowledge of our culture used to be limited to stories toldby my parents and desikar slokams which i learnt when i was a kid. But i managed to read up on our culture after coming to this country. One issue that was lingering in my mind for sometime was about the comparison of Lord Narayana with other hindu gods. I found several Srivaishnava publications which went the whole nine yards in convincing that Lord Vishnu is the param poruL. I am happy about this. But they dont have to say thatthe other gods fall under the category "lesser gods". Nobody is having any doubt if Lord Vishnu is the ultimate god or not. Nobody asked whether if Lord Vishnu is more/less powerful than Shiva (or for thatmatter any other hindu god). Without offending anyone, these arguments make me think of those days when i was kid when i use to argue with my friends about who will win if we had a fight between my father and his father. I really dont understand why there should be a lengthy discussion about powers of Gods or who is the ultimate god. At the offset if somebody is subscribed to this list, one can assume that he/she believes in Lord Vishnu and efforts can be focussed on discussing the kalyana gunas of our god. Also regarding the statement of Sri Mani Varadharajan about doing pujas to pillayar, does the same rule apply to Hanumar too? What is his position with respect to nithya suris? -Ram prasad
- Next message: Raja Krishnasamy: "Please excuse me for posting this in this group, but I felt it has some merit"
- Previous message: Vidyasankar Sundaresan: "Re: A Question for Sri Vidyasankar"
- Next in thread: Krishna Kalale: "Re: piLLaiyAr"
- Maybe reply: Krishna Kalale: "Re: piLLaiyAr"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]