Re: "Visrujya Lajyaam" - without shyness!
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 24, 2002
Sri Parthasarathi thunai Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha Dear pradeep, Adiyen absolutely accepts what you say. The purpose of my mail was not to contradict your view. Without any doubt Nama sankeertanam is for all. For someone with less talents, ego is less and hence leaving his shyness is easier but for someone with higher talents he will surely feel shy to do a thing which he thinks is inferior to his status. So when adiyen said the sloka referred to EVEN the haughty brahmins, it means that there is no exclusion. In geetha, bhagavan says that women and sudras can easily attain his feet doing just their duty and namakeertanam but this doesnt in anyway convey that nama sankeertanam is not for brahmins or men of first three varnas. When even a highly talented person has to do nAma keertanam and when even a less qualified person gets the same result due to nAma keertanam then where is the barrier to stop each one of us from doing Hari nAma sankeertanam. Alwar emperumAnAr Jeeyer thiruvadigalE sharanam Adiyen Ramanuja Dasyai Sumithra Varadarajan. Pradeep Janakiraman wrote:dear Varadarajan agreed that in olden days, some brahmins were haughty and they thought that mere bhagavan-naama in comparison to the vedas was inferior. But if the idea(basis) of this slokam was to mean "visrujya lajjyam" (leave your shyness) then it seems to interpret as if this was meant only for those haughty brahmins. but its not like that. This is meant for anyone and everyone, whether he has read the vedas or not. Whether its a man or woman, whether its a child or a old man, whether its a king or pauper. Also for those who have committed sins and think they have no hope at all. [...] -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: TCA Venkatesan: "Re: /cinnaJ/ciRu kAlE: Shri Harikrishnan's and Shri Vasudevan's comments"
- Previous message: Sreenivas Chakravarthy: "Re: Fwd: Tirumala main door & game of dice"
- In reply to: Pradeep Janakiraman: "Re: "Visrujya Lajyaam" - without shyness!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]