Re: Dvividha in Srimad Bhagavatam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 20, 2002
Malolan I started off saying that neither was I a pundit of Bhagavatam and neither would my explanation for Dvivida's vadham be convincing. And that it was just an attempt and said, I dont even know if it was of any use to MAni at all. I was just expressing my thoughts. Now, a) it doesnt matter to me how many times you discussed the Sri Vaikuntam vs Karya Vaikuntam stuff, when, where and how and where the archives lie etc., because am not a regular here. Nowhere does the moderator mention that one has to cover all the syllabus of all the archives and read all the volumes of bhasyams before participating in a discussion here. I thought its a place for novices like Pradeep to learn from Panditha-Jambavaans like you. So it beckons some cordiality from you to accomodate the lesser souls. If indeed I was writing irrelevant of repetitive stuff, then I guess the moderator could have rejected my posting. b) onto your explanation. Have you in anyway answered the original question yet ? other than referring me to archives and Valmiki Ramayana Bhaashyam i dont see you having answered Mani's original point through this reply. This comment you could have sent me as a personal note or the moderator could have done that. c) Onto the main point of discussion. If Bhishma was bound by a vow to protect the Kauravas and he himself gave the suggestion to Yudhistra, then that was his destiny, Praarabdham. But that still doesnt take the fact away that he was a devotee of Narayana right ? As long as one sides with evil, either bound a vow or by blood or friendship or lordship, the result is clear, you have to perish, maybe its a Brahma-astram, or Sudarshana- Chakram instead of a mere arrow. Once again, if dwaara-palakas were born as Asuras, then its possible for anyone to err at any point. My stream of thought was that God can play a leelai by which someone's mind makes him commit an error. Later God himself deals with it in his own ways. Its all His wish. That's what I was trying to convey. - Pradeep -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Sundarajan: "Re: chitranchiru kaale!!"
- Previous message: K Balaji: "Re: chitranchiru kaale!!"
- In reply to: Malolan Cadambi: "Re: Dvividha in Srimad Bhagavatam"
- Next in thread: Hari Krishnan: "Re: Dvividha in Srimad Bhagavatam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]