dosha?: was: brahman's pervasiveness in ugly matter
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 16, 2002
--- In bhakti-list@y..., Bhashyam Raghunandanwrote: > Dear Sri Ramkumar, > I think for the Brahman, there is no distinction > between the goog and ugly matter. Sriman Narayana is > should be certainly present in all substances. Why > ugly matter, he should be present in those animals > which live on this ugly matter. He should be present > in those krimis in the ugly matter itself. According > to our philosophy there is no substance which is not a > shareera of the Brahman. > "Akila-heya-pratyaneekan" does not mean that he is not > present in ugly matter, but it means that he posses no > bad qualities. He is also called as "Apahathapapma" > which means that while he is all pervading, no dosha > of a specific substance will affect him in any way. > Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan. > Raghunandan Thanks for this post. Can you explain to me what exactly is meant by 'dosha'? Thank you very much. Bill -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: MURALI MURALI: "sahasranam namavali repetition"
- Previous message: Gunaseelan V: "RE: Books on 4000 Divya prapandam & Alwars"
- Next in thread: S K: "Re: dosha?: was: brahman's pervasiveness in ugly matter"
- Reply: S K: "Re: dosha?: was: brahman's pervasiveness in ugly matter"
- Reply: Malolan Cadambi: "Re: dosha?: was: brahman's pervasiveness in ugly matter"
- Maybe reply: Lakshmi Narasimhan Venkatapathy: "Re: dosha?: was: brahman's pervasiveness in ugly matter"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]