The Offering
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 4, 2002
Srimate SrivanSatakopa Sri Vedanta Desika yatindra Mahadesikaya Nama: The Offering The Lord is the most magnificent person, with the best of all attributes. He is the Supreme deity of this world and others, at whose pleasure they subsist. He is the Creator, Protector and Destroyer of all beings, sentient and non-sentient. By His very nature of unbridled supremacy, the Lord would be totally inaccessible to us mortals, plagued as we are with the accumulated baggage of bad deeds. Where are we, with all our frailties and faulty faculties, and where He, the Supreme Lord of all that exists! Our wish to see Him, to worship Him, etc., are akin to a total cripple, bereft of all his limbs, and lying at the bottom of a deep pit, aspiring to ride on top of an elephant, towering majestically over him. So we despair of ever being able to interact in any fashion with the Lord. However, what if the mighty elephant itself were to kneel down and, with its soft trunk, pick up the cripple gently and put him on its back, to give him the ride of his life? This would be the only way the cripple could So too, the glorious Lord reaches down from the heights of His supremacy and is born time and again in this humdrum world, to live as one with us mortals, to share in our happiness and sorrow. And, in order to benefit those who were not around when He took His avataras, He also contracts His form and resides in idols made of stone, metal and mere mud too, consecrated at various temples, as the "arcchA moorthi". Even if He forsakes His mighty form and resides in temples, He is no less powerful and magnificent than He is at Sri Vaikuntam. We now come to the question-what do we offer such a powerful person, an entity of such incomparable greatness? We have heard of mighty tributes being paid to Kings of yore, but these rulers pale into insignificance when compared to this Supreme Being. What indeed can we impoverished mortals offer Him, which is commensurate with His splendour? Rack our brains as we might, we fail to come up with a satisfactory answer: the immeasurable greatness of the Lord and the insignificance of any offering that we may think of, leave us stumped. The richest and choicest of food and beverages we can conjure up, the most wonderful of clothes we can weave, the most precious of gems and jewellery we can dream of- all these appear totally inadequate when we consider the grandeur of the intended recipient. So what do we do? We cannot also give up in despair the entire idea of an offering, for our inner mind, conscious of the bounties He has bestowed us with, insists on some sort of tribute, however laughably insufficient. W Though embarrassed, He does favour us with a reply- "Patram pushpam phalam tOyam yO mE bhaktyA prayacchati tadaham bhakti upahrutam asnAmi prayatAtmana:" Says the Lord, "whatever is offered to Me with devotion, whether it be a fruit, flower, a Tulsi leaf or mere water, I accept it gladly and with full satisfaction." We are extremely relieved that the Lord asks for so little, something that could be safely acquired without major expenditure, and offered with ease. Then we realise with dismay that the Lord has added a rider, making the offering most difficult. The fine print, which we have omitted to peruse, reads "bhaktyA" and "prayatAtmana:" Even if the offering is a worthless leaf, if it is submitted with devotion and a pure mind, the Lord accepts the same with immense satisfaction. Here, purity of mind refers to offering to the Lord without the expectation of anything in return. Almost all of us are used to bargaining with Emperuman-" if only I get through this exam with laurels, I will adorn you with new clothes. If my daughter gets a good match, I shall perform tirumanjanam. If I am cured of this malady, I shall perform anga pradakshinam" etc. The offering to the Lord should be with the realisation that it is our duty to offer it to the Lord: not only that, but we should also offer it with the sole aim of pleasing Him (Bhagavat preetyarttham). We find this hard to believe- such a towering entity, and being pleased with a mere flower or water! "Impossible!", say we to ourselves. The patient Lord reminds us of various instances where He had indeed been pleased beyond measure with insignificant tributes. As Sri Krishna, He accepted with genuine pleasure the "aval" offered to Him by his boyhood friend Sudhama, known more popularly as "KuchEla" due to his inelegant attire. As Chakravartthi Tirumagan, He partook of jungle fruits submitted with love by Sabhari. And again in Sri Krishnavatara, He ate with relish the banana peel, which Sri Vidura, engrossed in conversation, offered Him after throwing away the fruit. We are still unable to believe this, even if it is the Lord who says so. We look for corroboration by impartial third parties. And we do find it in Sage Vyasa's words in Sri Mahabharata- "anyat poorNAt apAm kumbhAAt anyat pAdAvanEjanAt anyat kusala samprasnAt na cha icchati JanArdana:" Wonderstruck at the Lord's undemanding nature, Sri Vyasa Bhagavan exclaims," Sri Krishna demands little other than a pot of water (reception with poorna kumbham), washing His feet with water and a mere word of inquiry as to His well-being". And while accepting these insignificant offerings, the Lord deems them to be priceless if offered with devotion and accepts them with His head, rather than with His feet, says the Mahabharata- "yA; kriyA:samprayuktA:syu: EkAnta gata buddhibhi: ta: sarvA: shirasA dEva: pratigrihNAti vai svayam". Thus, the litmus test of an ideal offering appears to be the degree of bhakti with which it is submitted, rather than its quantity, value or magnificence. This is confirmed by the PancharAtra Samhita, which says, "aNu api upahritam bhaktai: mama bhOgAya jAyatE Bhooryapi abhaktO upahritam tat na mE bhOgAya jAyatE". The Lord says that even the most insignificant offering affords Him intense enjoyment, when offered by a devotee. Conversely, He does not relish even the most precious tribute, if the contributor lacks piety and dedication. The Lord is so kind, He does not want us to strain ourselves to make an offering. He is immensely satisfied with what little we have to offer, if only we submit it with bhakti. It would be appropriate to conclude this piece with an anecdote from the life of the great Acharya, Sri Parasara Bhattar. Commenting upon the TiruvAimozhi pasuram "parivadil eesanai padi virivadu mEval uruveer piri vagai indri nanneer tooy purivaduvum pugai poovE" Sri Bhattar told his disciple that the Lord would be satisfied with the smoke from burning rubbish as incense, and an offering of a thorny flower as adornment. The disciple Nanjeeyar, another great Acharya, pointed out the ShAstraic provision that thorny flowers should not be offered to the Lord ("na kanta kArikA pushpam DevAya vinivEdayEt"). Quipped Sri Bhattar," This dictum does not mean that Emperuman dislikes a thorny flower: it is out of the Lord's concern that the prickly thorn may injure the devotee while plucking the flower." Srimate SriLakshmINrsimha divya paduka sevaka SrivanSatakopa Sri Narayana Yatindra Mahadesikaya Nama: Dasan, sadagopan. . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: A.Mahesh: "An alangaram a month (Sept'02)"
- Previous message: kuntimaddi sadananda: "Re: doubt reg GITA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]