VishtAdvaita (in connection with Sri Damodar Swarup's queries)
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 20, 2001
SrI: SrImathE Gopaladesika mahadesikaya namah: Dearest Srivaishnavas, Sri Damodar swarup had raised few queries and Sri Sadanana answered then quite well: adiyEn wants to add two cents (in order to understand the VisishtAdvaita philosophy better). The three authoritative scriptures referred to as Prastaana Trayam are: -Vedas (Sruti) - Poorva & Uttara Mimaamsa together. -Bhagavat Gita -Brahma Sutras - Of Veda Vyasa Bhagavan. Veda is Apourusheyam (unauthored -not authored by anybody). Lord revealed the same and taught to four faced Brahma. Veda is eternal, and has no date of origin and end. Veda is the only ultimate authority and hasno MISTAKES at all. The sruthi vAkhyams (statements) do not and contradict with each other(unlike our statements:-) If they appear so to us, it reflects our lack of understanding of sruthis and not their flaws (where there are no flaws..) As long as any philosophy is in conformity with Statements (encompassed) in these three scriptures, and more so to Vedas, then, that needs to be considered as VaidIka philosophy. Any philosophy which contradicts Vedic statement is uncondiered non-vaidIka. It is not that Sri Ramanuja established this VisishtAdvaita philosophy. He only expounded the same. He has interpreted Stuthi vAkhyams and Brahma Suthras /GitA based on his AcharyAs' works. (listed below) In Vedas, there are abhEdha sruthis, bhEdha sruthis and Ghataka sruthis. Advaita- Monism is based on AbhEda sruthis; Dwaita- Dualism is based on bhEda sruthis VisishtAdvaita- based on Ghataka sruthis (encompassing both bhEdha and abhEdha sruthis) Thus, all the three philosophies are based on Vedic statements. Sri Ramanujacharya has based his system of philosphphy and interpretation on Ghataksa sruthi and on preceptor's works -Bagavath Bodhayana (who wrote Bodhayana vritthi in 100,000 granthas on Vyasa's Brahma suthram), -Dramidacharya (who wrote a commentary on Brahma sUthra- called Dramida Bhashya), -TankAcharya (also known as Brahmanandi- who wrote a treatise on Brahma sUthras - knows as Vartika); -Guhadevacharya -Acharya Bharuchi (who wrote a treatise on Dharma saasthra and commented on Brahma sUthra) -Acharya Kapardi- (who wrote commentaries on Brahma sUthra and Apasthama Kalpa sUthras) -Nathamuni- who wrote NyAya tattvam and Yoga rahsyam -Yamunacharya (916 CE to 1041 CE) who wrote Siddhitraya (embodying Athma siddhi, Iswara Siddhi and Samvit Siddhi), Agama pramANya and others) No doubt all three (dwaita, Advaita and Visishtadvaita) are follwing Vedic statements. With due and high regards to them, adiyEn's intention is to elaborate the scriptural authority and accepatcne of totality of Vedic statements in VisishtAdvaita without any conflicts on bhEda /abhEda sruthis. (as beautifully elaborated by SrI Bhagavath Ramanujacharya) The Vedas do not say anywhere that Bheda Srutis are incorrect or that only Abheda Srutis are correct or vice versa. The answer is provided by the Sarira- Sariri Bhava (the Body- Soul-relationship) - the basis of Visishtadvaita which answers the conflicts. Thus, the central teaching of the VisishtAdvaita philosophy is that Parabrahman, The Supreme Lord, Sriya: Pathi Sriman Narayanan is in reality, the only one "TRUTH" (Tattva). It is eternal (Nithya), unconditioned reality (Satya) and infinitie knowledge (jnAna), infinitie on ppoint of time and space (anantha), Omnipresent (vibhu), Omniscient (Sarvajna), Omni potent (Sarvashakthan). He is the Material Cause (UpAdhAna kaaraNa), instrumental cause (nimitta kaaraNa) as well as the auxiliary cause (Sahakaari kAraNa) of the Universe. Other names given in Vedas for this Parabrahman are: Sat (Self -existent), Atma (spirit), Brahman (Great?), Isa or ISwara (Lord), VishNu, Narayana (they are not common names! ), PurushOtthama, Vaasudeva. Parabrahman, being the only Reality (Tattwa) is the cause of the Universe or worlds. It is knowable in the condition of manifestation but does not belong to the category of "material" in the normal sense of the term. While Parabrahman is the INDEPENDENT Reality, Chit (sentient) and achit (non-sentient) are the two dependent realities out of the Lord - Parabrahman as His SarIra. In fact, these two DEPENDENT RELAITIES are thus, the QUALITIES of the INDEPENDENT REALITY (the Lord). Thus, there is only one Brahman (advaita), who has chit and achit as its inseparable attributes (chit-achit viSishTa). It is only the "advaita" of this sense that is present in the actual reality (jIvAtma and matter are inseparable attributes of Brahman). Brahman/Iswara, chit and achit are distinct from one another, though related (with chit and achit as inseparable attributes to Brahman). These three maintain an indisoluble union, inseparable unity among themselves. Better said: (in the words of our Sri Anand Karalapakkam) As VEdAnta dESika says, Brahman alone, as organically related to the entire cit and acit, is the one ultimate Reality (aSEsha-cidacit-prakAram brahmaikamEva tattvam). Though there is absolute difference between Iswara and the other two reals and also among individual souls and matter, the ultimate Reality is considered as one because as an organic unity it is one. In this sense, the system of vEdAnta expounded by RAmAnuja is described as ViSishtAdvaita which means oneness of the organic unity (ViSishtasya advaitam). Sriman nArAyaNA out of His great compassion towards the baddha jIvAtmAs propagates vedAs and allied sAstrAs , which are the only way through which they can possibly know about Him & the ways to reach Him. The ultimate and final essence of sAstrAs is that Sriman NArAyaNA is the sarIrI and ,all chit & achit are His sarIrA. This eternal sarIra sarIrI bhAvA is composed of the following three things: a. AdheyatvA (ie.being supported by a sarIrI) : Existence of the sarIrA(body) is due to the sarIrI ie. sarIrI supports the sarIrA. In other words , if sarIrI ceases to exist , sarIrA also ceases to exist. b. niyamyatvA (ie. being controlled by a sarIrI ) : Not only that sarIrA derives its existence from a sarIrI, it is also being controlled by the sarIrI. So , sarIrA acts as per the will/desires of sarIrI. c. seshatvA (ie. existing for the pleasure of sarIrI ) : Not only that sarIrA is supported & controlled by sarIrI , it exists only for the pleasure of sarIrI ie. sarIrI is sarIrA's Master. It is to be noted that the "sarIrI" needn't be physically present inside a "sarIrA". This is not a condition to be met out for the sarIra-sarIrI bhAvA to hold good.. Thus Sriman NArAyaNA supports and controls all jIvAtmAs, and all the jIvAtmAs exist purely for His enjoyment. Thus, the very essential nature (svaroopam) of a jIvAtmA is to perform kainkaryam to Sriman NArAyaNA for His pleasure and performance of any other activity doesn't conform to its nature. Thanks to Sri Damodar and Sri Sadananda for the thread and for giving us an opportunity to enjoy our philosophy and Sampradayam. Trust beginners like me, can understand and perceive the VisistAdvaita philosophy. It is receommended to read Sri SMS Chari's books in English on Vaisnavism, Advaita and VisishtAdvaita, Fundamentals of Visishtadvaita Vedantha, Philosphy of Vedantha Suthra etc. They are treasures. Please fogrive adiyEn for his indulgence. Though not qualified, adiyEn wrote (Fools rush in where angels fear to tread:-) Regards Narayana Narayana aDiyEn Narayana dAsan madhavakkannan _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Madhavakkannan V: "Swamy Desikan- 13- Yaadhavaabhyudhayam- ThUppul maNdapam kaimkaryam appeal"
- Previous message: Kaliyur Srinivasan Ravi: "Vishnavas temples in TN and AP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]