Depicting of 'tirumaN-kAppu'.
From the Bhakti List Archives
• September 12, 2001
Dear SriVaishnavas, Sri T. Sundara Rajan, KM Narayanan et al seem to opine from a side that does not speak for the whole Sri Vaishnava community. Less Euphuism, I'll get to the point straight! If Sri Madhava Kannan or someone else tried to change("revert"?) the ThirumaN in the photograph now, shouldnt it be considered sinful?? It is again against the prevelant norms. If you know someone that was responsible for making this change in the 1st place then that's a different issue. > >The 'AkAram' (graphic form) of the tirumaN-kAppu is important for >its place in the 'Agamam/purANam/history' and the symbolism of > >philosophical message. > Whether we like it or not, we need to recognize there's some diversity in our Sapmradayam. The ThirumaN-kappu is important for the arCa thirumEni agreed! Atleast one should be happy that the tirumaN-kAppu *is* there as per the agamas. But then just because one particular sect has had control over a temple for some years does not validate or attest the authenticity of the TirumaN. History of this sort has always been rewritten every twenty years. Now if we need to reform things and "preserve" status quo where do we begin? Triplicane?? Try to convince people there that Swamy DEsikan actually sports a vadakalai naamam everywhere else and that forcing a nammam on his ArchA-thirumeni doesnt change a thing..? And lastly, we were really blessed by Sri Velukkudi Swami's visit to the US and Sri Sampath Kumar must realize he must continue to focus on general unification to receive patronage from both Kalaiyars to sustain this Sampradaayam be it in the Gulf or in the US and not harp on such controversial issues. None of us seem to have the capability to reconcile the two kalais. Let us in the meanwhile atleast try to recognise the differences and respect each other there, as we are and *carry on in our services*. I promise you all I will write no more on this matter. RAmanujasya CharaNau sharaNam prapadhyE! > >Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 08:04:03 +0530 > From: Tirumanjanam Sundara Rajan>Subject: Depicting of 'tirumaN-kAppu'. > >Friends, > >May I add my own to Sri PB Sampatkumar's appreciation of Sri Madhava >Kannan's gesture. > >I had a recent occasion to address a friend separately on this very >issue (a little before Sri PBS wrote) and he had been gracious enough to >take note of it. I paraphrase what I wrote _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Sudarsanan: "RE: Burning of dead bodies"
- Previous message: Srinath Chakravarty: "parakaala maTha abhimaanis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]