Re: Challenge 3.12: "IF MOBILE AND IMMOBILE COULD GO TO HEAVEN, WHY NOT I?"
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 22, 1999
--- Ramanbil@aol.com wrote: > SwAmi VEdAnta DEsika's "NaichyAnusanthAnam" and > "SAtvika AhamkAram " > (As gleaned from his StOtras.) - > Part 3 - SWAMI CHALLENGES! > Do you remember that when your "avatAra kAryam" was > completed in your vibhava > avatAram as Sri Rama, you took with you to Heavens> (sAnthAnika lOka) all > living creatures including the grass and shrubs? Why > did you do that?> Is it not because of their having just happening to> exist in your city of > sAkEta? > > KoorathAzhwAn in his VaradarAja Sthavam asks a > similar question -> "No doubt, I have not adopted any means. But, what> yoga did the denizens of > sAkEta did to deserve ascending to Heavan?" Regarding above, adiyen has once learnt that citizens of Saketa all en masse earned passage to parama-padam alongwith SriRama because they were subjects of Bharatha who had earlier performed "saranAgathi" to Lord Rama not only for himself but also for them. By virtue of their king's deed of "saranagathi" the subjects also enjoyed the "phalan" of "prapatti" i.e. they became 'adhikAri-s" for "mOksham". Dharma-sookshmum here is that consequences of king's deed visit his subjects, good or bad. Similarly, consequences of superior's deeds visit subordinates, of parent's upon their children and so on and so forth. Also that true king should look after welfare of subjects not only in this world but also in the other world i.e. king should be concerned about subject's material prosperity and also spiritual welfare. Another 'sookshmum' I learnt here is the power of "prapatti". So from all this adiyen also learns that it is not as if denizens of Saketa did not have necessary qualifications to en masse attain parama-padam at the end of Rama avatara. What more qualification they require other than being subjects of true 'prapanna-n' like Bharatha? So all credit for this event in Ramayana should go to Bharatha not to Sri.Rama, adiyen is thinking. Swami Desikan therefore was not completely right in challenging poor Sri.Rama with this precedent. What could poor SriRama do? Matter was not in his hands at all. But it is all actually very good poetic humour of our Swami Desikan and very interesting. adiyen don't know what 'abiprAyam' you all have in this matter. Sampathkumaran ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
- Next message: Nadadur: "Sri Desika Sthothramala on CD -- Vol 1-3"
- Previous message: Kalyani Krishnamachari: "nAcciyAr tirumozhi X - kArkkODal pUkkAL 2"
- Maybe in reply to: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: "Challenge 3.12: "IF MOBILE AND IMMOBILE COULD GO TO HEAVEN, WHY NOT I?""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]