Re: SaatrumuRai

From the Bhakti List Archives

Ramanbil • October 26, 1998

Dear Srinivasan:
My comments were not intended to disprove what you have stated. In fact, my
knowledge in all these fields is a complete zero. Your interpretation is
nonetheless plausible and it is an alternative way of looking at it. Sri
Vijayaraghavan has presented another view too which also cannot be disputed.
On the whole, any discussion in this forum leads to multifaceted,
multidimensional, kaleidoscopic views which are equally relevant. Thank you as
well as Sri Vijay for refreshing interpretations.
Dasoham
Anbil Ramaswamy

---

• Next message: Krishna Susarla: "Shrii Venkatesha Suprabhaatam - 13"
• Previous message: Vijay Triplicane: "Sriman Madhavakkannan."
• Maybe in reply to: K. Srinivasan: "SaatrumuRai"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]