vibeeshana-saranagathi

From the Bhakti List Archives

sudarshan • October 22, 1998

> Sri.K.M.Narayanan writes:
> 
> "...... in case if it bagavat apacharam , Here God has discreation,
> only here piratti's purushakaram comes in to picture.
> like kakasura episode etc. etc."
> 
> Isn't "purushAkAra" 'sine qua non' in all cases?
> 
> Can one set limits to "pirAtti's" "purushAkAra" and imply that it is
> "ineffective" in cases of "bAgavatha-apachAram"? 
> 
> Can any learned member on the list please enlighten or clarify please?
> 
> dAsan,
> sudarshan
 

---

• Next message: L. Vijayaraman: "RE: Ashaucham & Nitya Karma"
• Previous message: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: "Part 9 on Role of dietary Regimen in Control of mind"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]