From the Bhakti List Archives
sudarshan
• Thu Oct 22 1998 - 08:58:50 PDT
> Sri.K.M.Narayanan writes:
>
> "...... in case if it bagavat apacharam , Here God has discreation,
> only here piratti's purushakaram comes in to picture.
> like kakasura episode etc. etc."
>
> Isn't "purushAkAra" 'sine qua non' in all cases?
>
> Can one set limits to "pirAtti's" "purushAkAra" and imply that it is
> "ineffective" in cases of "bAgavatha-apachAram"?
>
> Can any learned member on the list please enlighten or clarify please?
>
> dAsan,
> sudarshan
