Re: Bhakti and Prapatti - 4
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 11, 1998
Sri: Srimate Sri Lakshmi Nrusimha ParaBrahmane namaha Dear devotees , namo nArAyaNA . pranAmams . This posting is based on the teachings of bhagavad rAmAnujar as elaborated by swAmi Desikan . Sri Mani Varadarajan wrote: > Sri Anand wrote: > > Thus, prapatti is actually an act which is performed with all > > its entirety in a moment. > > Dear Anand, > > Is this not a slightly misleading statement? All Sri Vaishnavas > are agreed, irrespective of "kalai-bhEdam", that prapatti is > characterized primarily (or exclusively) by a certain kind of > knowledge. The term used for this is "jnAna-veSEsha". Should it > not be said that prapatti, for followers of Desika, is primarily > a mental resolve with the act as an important "anga" or accessory? > The modus operandi explained in Ahirbudhyna samhita, Lakshmi tantra etal further elaborated by many poorvAchAryAs has the "act " of prapatti referring to Atma, bhara and phala samarpanam. These three form the angI . The five angAs doesn't constitute the very act of prapatti . rather they are accessories only . Neverthless , they need to be there for a fruitful prapatti . More later on to what extent Sriman NArAyaNA expects these angAs to be present during various types of prapatti . Jn~Anam is indeed has to be there for performing prapatti . But prapatti is not merely that jn~Anam ( bhagavad seshatvam etc ) . more later . > After all, the vAkya is "jnAnAn moksha:, ajnAnAt samsAra:". Liberation > results from knowledge, ignorance leads to worldly existence. Or, > "tam eva viditvA ati mRtyum Eti" -- knowing Him alone, one crosses > over death (SvetASvatara upanishad). > This is very much true. But one needs to understand what it means . Liberation results from knowledge . But the knowledge by itself is not the liberation . There is a huge difference between these two . From sAstrAs, one needs to firmly understand the tattvAs first . This must result in one obtaining the most important knowledge concerning the sarIra sarIrI bhAvA existing between the jIvAtmA and the paramAtmA. But , a jIvATmA after knowing this tattvA ( jn~Anam of seshatvam to Divya dampati etc ) , should look into what the purushArtam (goal) is . Once that is understood , he/she has to look into what the hitam (means) is . sAstrAs says that for obtaining the purushArtam of moksham there are two hitams bhakti and prapatti accoding to the qualification of a mumukshu . The knowledge so gained should result in adopting any one of the means (sAdhya upAyam) since thats what Sriman NArAyaNA has ordered through sruti and smruti . We can't make our own judgement that by being in such and such a way, we shall obtain moksham ( anyway perumAL is merciful . Why won't he grant moksham to me etc type of attitude.this has no pramAnams from sAstrAs) . So, whatever sAstrAs ( bhagavad Aj~nA) say as hitam has to be followed . If one takes up upAsanA , well and good . There are detailed descriptions on the 32 brahma vidyAs and he can perfect it . If one feels that he can't perform all these things and is beyond his capacity , he can take up the other hitam viz. prapatti . It is to be noted that knowledge on the hitam thus acts as a pre requisite for performing it . It is important to understand that bhakti is very much issued as a command for a mumukshu to be followed . Hundreds of pramAnams are there for this from upanishads and allied scriptures . Infact , in gItA KrishnA keeps on telling that one has to do bhakti yogam ( bhajasva etc type of vidhi / commands ) .Similarly , prapatti is also enshrined as a vidhi ( command) to be performed ( saranam vraja , AtmAnam mayi nikshipedh , AtmAthmeeya bharanyAsO hi Atma nikshEpa uchyate etc ) . These two are the hitam . Now lets look at the pre requisite for prapatti . One of them is the ananya gatitvam ( no other resort other than Sriman NArAyaNA ) . This the faculty of knowledge (jn~nam) that is needed. Also, the five angAs needs to be known . With respect to prapatti , the statement jn~Anam results in liberation means that once ananyagatitvam is achieved and the hitam prapatti is understood (5 angAs etc ), then it leads to moksham wherein one actually performs the act of prapatti by the mercy of a sadAchAryA. Scriptures say nAma sankeertanam results in moksham , divya desa yAtrA results in moksham , dip in sacred pushkarinIs result in moksham , contact with bhAgavathAs results in moksham , residing at divya desam results in moksham etc etc . All these things mean that it will make a jIvAtmA one day to perform the hitam and attain moksham , because of such pious acts. Thus if a person is devouted and performs such activities , its just a matter of time (few births probably ) for him/her to attain moksham . So the statement as such that divya desa yAtrA leads to moksham is not false since Sriman NArAyaNA guides that jIvAtmA to finally perform either bhakti or prapatti and make it as the vyAjA for granting moksham . Similarly, jn~Anam results into moksham . But the act of prapatti is not the jn~Anam by itself . Goptrutva varanam is an angA of prapatti wherein you have to ask Sriman NArAyaNA for granting the eternal kainkaryam at Sri VaikuNTham . During bhara samarpanam, Sriman NArAyaNA is pleaded to be present in the place of bhakti yogam . These type of things during prapatti are "acts " and are different from the various knowledge that one may have about even prapatti . SwAmi Desikan in Srimad RTS points out the criticism of BhAshyakArar over advaitin's mode of liberation based on the understanding of their interpretation on "tattvamasi" . To those advaitins who claim that liberation is obtained by mere avidhEya jn~Anam based on vAkya janyam , bhAshyakArar says that it is anAdharaNEyam due to upAsanAvidhi vaiyarthyAdhigaL. SwAmi Desikan has already raised the very question you have asked ( no one can be as predictive as swAmi desikan regarding our mode of thinking ) and says that the answer is already given by bhAshyakArar . Thus prapatti is an act that is performed with 5 angAs ( jn~Anam etc becomes a subset ) and not merely jn~Anam about Sriman NArAyaNA's saving grace / His paratvam/ His soulabhyam . It is not merely the seshatva anusandhAnam . The act of Atma nikshepa etc has to be there . > > It was my understanding that in the performance of SaraNAgati, the > most important aspect was "mahAviSvAsa", or supreme faith that > the paramAtmA SrIman nArAyaNa will undoubtedly save the supplicant. > mahAviSvAsa is just a unique kind of knowledge. > The most important angA of prapatti is mahAvisvAsam (supreme faith) . But , that by itself is not prapatti . It is only an angA of prapatti . But what is this mahA visvAsA ? It is the supreme faith on Sriman NArAyaNA that He would grant moksham for the prapatti thus performed ie. Supreme faith on the efficacy of prapatti . Mere knowledge that Sriman NArAyaNA is highly merciful to protect and grant moksham to those who surrender to Him, is not the mahA visvAsam . One has to "surrender" ie. perform prapatti and while surrendering ( act of prapatti) , one should have this supreme faith . It is to be noted that " surrendering" implies that all the modus operandi of prapatti in its entirety is performed and it does not refer to a mere prayer / faith / falling at His Lotus feet etc . MahAvisvAsam as an angam of prapatti doesn't mean that one has to leavedemigod worship and resort to Sriman NArAyaNA alone. Infact, this abstain from demigod worship and resorting to Sriman nArAyaNA alone is called as "ananyagatitvam" a pre-requisite qualification for performing prapatti and is not an angam. For performing any act prescribed in vedAs , faith (visvAsam) is needed. But , heavy emphasis on faith for performing prapatti is prescribed in sAstrAs because one will doubt it in various ways. In Srimad Rahasya Traya sAram , SwAmi Desikan beautifully explains the various doubts that shall arise in one's mind which will lead to one's lack of mahA viswAsam. For instance naichyAnusandhAnam also when done inappropriately will lead to this disaster of doubting prapatti ie. " I am a fool , stupid . Has no qualification . King of Sinners. How can Sriman nArAyaNA grant moksham , the greatest of all things one can obtain, to such a sinner like me, for a simple act of prapatti ? ". Well , this person hasn't understood the thiru uLLam of Divya Dampati at all; he is just emotionally outpouring something. But that emotional outpouring is not born out from the eye of sAstrAs . All devotion and emotions should emerge from the sAstrAs for it is the only guide for a baddha jIvAtmA . If that is not based on sAstrAs , then it is just some blaberring based on aj~nAnam ie.ignorance .All bhagavad anubhavams should arise out of the knowledge as perceived out of the eye of sAstrAs. In this above case, the devotee performing naichyAnusandAnam hasn't understood a,b,c,d of prapatti . When Sriman NArAyaNA Himself promises so many times that He would grant and in the past has done it for many , who is this guy to doubt even Lord ? In front of Lord's mercy , one's sins are nothing . SwAmi Desikan in general discusses five cases in which one would loose mahA viswAsam ( similar to above ) and gives five reasons by which he can strengthen his mahA viswAsam ( purushakAratvam of pirAtti can NEVER be violated by perumAL ; etc ) . Thus, MahA visvAsam is an important angA of prapatti . But it is not the prapatti by itself . --- to be continued --- namo nArAyaNA adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan anantha padmanAbha dAsan sarvam sri krishnArpanamastu
- Next message: John Lawrence Corey [Yakov Leib HaKohain]: "DISCUSSION FORUM ON JEWISH MYSTICISM"
- Previous message: Mohan Sagar: "Re: Vibhishana Saranagati -- a query"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]