Response to Rama Balasubramaniam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 9, 1997
Dear Prapatti Group Members: I want to thank Murali for his wonderful posting on Lord Hayagreeva. I hope at least during my next visit to India I get an opportunity to have the Darshan of the Lord at Parakala Matam and Poundrika Puram Ashramam. I also thank Rama Balasubramaniam for her clarifications on mine and Shri Krishna Kalale's postings. My involvement with the local temple activities has highly stressed the need for cooperation between the Smarthas and the Vaishnavas and even beyond (between the North and South Indians). Therefore I think it is very important for us to know each other's viewpoint on matters of worship and particularly temple worship. I have always found that a temple program that involves everyone in a spirit of cooperation irrespective of their lindividual leanings adds to everyone's joy. As asthikas we are all scattered in different parts of this country and since it is difficult for any single group to sustain their own traditional institution, it has rather become a necessity here that we come together To begin with, most Vaishnavas assume that Smarthas are either Saivites or Shakthas (Sri Vidya Upasakas). After one attends one of their poojas one begins to understand that Vishnu also gets a place in their worship (sometimes a primary place in their Panchayatana Pooja and sometimes much to the discomfort of a Vaishnava - For eg. as in Rudra Mahanyasam it is said that "Vishnu: Padhau Thishtathy"). The fact that they conclude all their poojas with "Kayena Vacha... Narayanethy Samparpayami" brings the Vaishnavas closer to them. When it comes to performing a Homam the concluding part of a "Smartha performed Homam" is more Vaishnavistic than what Vaishnavas perform. While offering the Poornahuti the mantra "Vishnave Swahaha - Vishnavae PARAMAATMANE idam na mama" is common to both, some of the slokas used in the smartha sampradayam for the Agni-Pradakshinam identifies Madhava with Yagnya Purusha and it is indeed pleasing to hear. For some reason we don't say them. The mantras used in all vaidika samskaras are common to both sampradayams and for anyone who has a little knowledge in these things it becomes clear that Lakshmi-Narayana take a primary place. Added to this we have Adi Sankara's Bhaja Govindam as his most important and final message where he pours out his love for Govinda. People like Krishna Premi who grew up in the Smartha tradition and turning into a Narayana worshipper to the exclusion of other things is indeed striking. Also all Sanyasis in the smartha sampradayam signing as "Narayana Smruti". Smarthas Bhajana Sampradayam is another striking example of Vishnu worship. All these things sometimes make me wonder - what is it that is making the smarthas hesitate to go forward and openly accept Vishnu's Sarvottama. Vijayaraghavan Srinivasan Buffalo, NY
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Thirumangai Alwar and Thirujnanasambhanda Nayanar"
- Previous message: VXMADHAV: "Vaattamil kaNgaL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]