definition of Prapatti
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 15, 1996
---------------begin Jaganath's quote What is quoted above is only the requirements for Prapatti for Moksha. It is understandable why Pillai Lokacharya and Manavalamaamunigal would not even talk about Prapatti for other goals. That does not prove that Prapatti cannot be done for other goals. What Swami Desikan wrote on the subject merely reflect what is stated in the sastras. Even the Prapatti performed by Yamunacharya was for furtherance of the cause of Srivaishnavism, which is a little different from ensuring moksha for oneself, but still well within the limits of one's service to Sriman Narayana. ----------------end quote I think we should note the reason why Pillai Lokacharya and Manavalamamunigal did not address Prapatti for other goals. It lies within the Srirangam School's view of the nature of Prapatti itself, a subject for which I am very much the novice. However, I would like to provide my crude discussion of this subject below, and would request that others more qualified will add to this. Please note that this is not meant to challenge the views of Sri Vedanta Desika, but only to clarify the Thengalai view of Prapatti. The Thengalai traditions do not regard Prapatti as an act or sadhana that propitiates certain fruits. Instead, Prapatti is viewed as what Mumme calls "a simple one time affirmation" that the Lord is the Upaya and the Upeya, which becomes insignificant, almost meaningless, when compared to the Wondrous and Spontaneous Compassion of the Lord. It is, as another noted scholar on the subject, Nancy Ann Nayar calls, the "relinquishing of the idea that one is without a protector. " After this, the Prapanna recognizes that he/she is reliant completely on the Lord's Grace for the fulfilment of all spiritual and material gains, including, of course, the Lord Himself, who is the Ulimate Goal. The Thengalai Acharyas believe that as Prapatti is an affirmation of complete faith to the Lord, it would be sinful to perform it more than once, as this would indicate mistrust of the Lord's promise in the Geetha and the Ramayana -- that anyone who comes to Him just once saying that he is the Lord's, will be assured all protection from then on. If Prapatti were recognized to achieve any other fruits, we would all be performing it repeatedly, to achieve the various material and spiritual benefits that we desire. Daasanu Daasan, Mohan
- Next message: M K Sudarshan: "more on 'rahasya mantra" and "adhikara""
- Previous message: V. Sadagopan: "Omissions and Commissions on Dikshithar's Krithis on Sri Rama"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]