prapathi and adhikaaris
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 8, 1996
The recent view points expressed by certain members of this list on the need for ensuring the state of a mumukshu prior to even mentioning tirumantram, dvayam or the charama slokam give rise to a valid question: Have our pooravaacharyas addressed this issue, and if so, what has been said? They HAVE addressed this issue eloquently, and have unequivocally said that the only necessary qualifiers for prapathi are essential human qualities of interest (ruchi) and devotion (bhakti). Sri PiLLai lOkAchaaryar in Sri Vachana BhushaNam, I prakaraNam, sutram 23, 24 says prapathikku desha niyamamum, kAla niyamamum, prakAra niyamamum adhikaari niyamamum, phala niyamamum illai vishaya niyamame uLLadu meaning that to qualify to be in the true state of prapathi the only requirement is that of a sincere interest to comprehend or acquire knowledge, and nothing else. To be a prapanna, one does not have to conform to any requirements based on desha, kAla, prakAra or adhikaara. Sri MaNavaaLa maamunigaL's commentary for this sutram states thus: na jaathi bhedham na kulam na lingam na guNa kriyaahaa na desha kAlau naavastham yOgO hi ayam apekshathe brahma kshatra visha shUdraaha striyaschAntara jAthayaha sarva Eva prapadyeran sarvathA tharamachutham enru bhAradhwAja samhithaiyilum prapathehe kwachidapi Evam parApekshA na vidyathe saa hi sarvathra sarveshAm sarva kAma phala pradA enru phala niyamaa bhAvam sanathkumara samhithaiyilum sollappattadire prapathikku innaar adhikaarigaL enRoru niyathi illai ruchiyudeyaarellaarum adhikaarigaL engai The sole requirement for prapathi is vishayAsakthi or ruchi, there are no other restrictions. The vyakhyAnam explicitly cuts through all artificially created criteria (varNA/caste, linga, et al.) and qualifies everyone on the basis of Aasakthi in acquiring true knowledge. This is a universally applicable criterion and one that is known only to the prapanna and his/her Achaarya. Given this background, it is hardly relevant for any one person or group of persons to state the need to preclude any other interested person/s from exposure to fundamental aspects of our philosophy. Such exclusionary statements, I feel, reflect a lack of true comprehension of the mind lifting principles that form the basis for our philosophy. Aazhwaar Emberumaanaar Jeeyar ThiruvadigaLe SharaNam Sridhar
- Next message: M K Sudarshan: "(no subject)"
- Previous message: Thirumalai Anandanpillai: "Thirumantram - question on 'mantram yathnEna GOpayEth'"
- Next in thread: Krishna Kalale: "Re: prapathi and adhikaaris"
- Maybe reply: Krishna Kalale: "Re: prapathi and adhikaaris"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]