Re: Bhakti and Prapatti
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 23, 1995
Mani, I have serious doubts about your view : that akinchanyam and ananya gathitvam are main for tankalais. in fact they are the protogonists for the view that "prapattir vishvasaha" ie. prapatti is mainly trust ! in fact they use this view to retort the need for performance of prapatti as a karma - action. instead they state that prapatti is trust which is a mental attitude and knowledge. krishna ----- Begin Included Message ----- >From mani@srirangam.esd.sgi.com Sun Oct 22 14:49:22 1995 Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 11:42:16 -0700 From: mani@srirangam.esd.sgi.com (Mani Varadarajan) To: prapatti@srirangam.esd.sgi.com, Parthasarati DileepanSubject: Re: Bhakti and Prapatti P. Dileepan wrote: * > So, prapatti has no prerequisites! * > * > * * I was a little hasty with this statement. * One must have faith I think for prapatti. You have hit on the central point of debate between the Thengalai philosophy of surrender and the Vadagalai. According to Pillai Lokacharya, prapatti as no prerequisites at all. Faith is not a prerequisite but something that just falls into place if true prapatti is done. Prapatti involves 'akincanyam' (a feeling of helplessness) and 'ananygatitvam' (having no other refuge). The two examples cited time and time again are Kaakaasura, the bird who tormented Sita and then performed prapatti, and Draupadi, who when tormented by Duhsasana, surrendered to Lord Krishna. Mani ----- End Included Message -----
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Bhakti and Prapatti"
- Previous message: krish: "Ramanuja"
- Maybe in reply to: Eswar Josyula: "Bhakti and Prapatti"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Bhakti and Prapatti"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]