Re: bhakti vs prapatti
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 19, 1995
Parthasarati Dileepan writes: > On Thu, 19 Oct 95 01:25:10 UT Ramadas said: > >If this is the case, should I remove Shree and > >Ganesha from the peetum ... [...] > As for other dhEvathaa, I think we must differentiate > between Lakshmi (Sri) and some of others you have mentioned. > Swami Sri DhEsikan says, "kadi malaraaL piriyaadha > .... aruLaaLar," (Our Lord is never separated > from Lakshmi) Even as Vamanan, a brhamachari, our Lord > did not separate from thaayaar (Lakshmi); had her > concealed in his heart. Swami Desikan also implies that Lakshmi is the personification of the Lord's mercy -- ``karuNaam iva rUpiNIm.'' Thus, there is no real difference between Narayana and Sri; one cannot conceive of one without the other. Sri Desikan also writes about Rama, ``prabhaavaan sItayaa devyaa'' -- Rama is effulgent through his association with Sita. The rays of the sun are how we come in contact with its brilliance, but are yet inseparable and eternally associated with the sun. Similarly, the Lord's dayaa is eternally part of him, and through this grace we experience him. Mani
- Next message: Kanaka Vasudevan: "Re: introduction from Kanaka Vasudevan"
- Previous message: Jay.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Prapatti and Anya Devata Aradhana"
- In reply to: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: bhakti vs prapatti"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]