From the Bhakti List Archives
Mani Varadarajan
• Tue Oct 17 1995 - 13:09:35 PDT
In my opinion and understanding of Acharyas' works,
astrology and numerology have nothing to do with bhakti
and should be abandoned by a prapanna, i.e., by one
who has dedicated himself to the Lord. No less an
authority than Sri Vatsya Varadacarya, paramaguru
of Vedanta Desika, writes as such in the ``Prapanna
Parijata''.
The number 32 is significant in Desikar's works only
because it reminiscent of the 32 brahma-vidyas
(modes of meditation) explained in the Brahma-sutras.
It does not have any spiritual significance other
than that. I find it hard to believe that as logical
and devout a person as Desikar would use numerology
to enhance his works in the hope of some good luck.
Mani