Quarrel with saivites
From the Bhakti List Archives
Parthasarati Dileepan • Mon Oct 02 1995 - 13:29:28 PDT
Questioning our aachaaryaas:
As Krishna pointed out, as sri vasihnavaas
we must follow certain protocol while seeking
clarifications from our aachaaryaas. To my
knowledge blind faith is not advocated across
the board for everyone. Some great souls
have opted for just that. E.g. dhEvu maRRariyEn
of madhurakavi aazhvaar. Others have not hesitated
to question when appropriate. Kooraththaazhvaar's
devotion to sri raamaaanuja is unquestonable, yet
yet he refused to write on when some of
Sri Raamaanujaa's commentary was not to
his liking! Ramanuja himself refused to accept
Yadavaprakasar's teachings.
Quarrel with saivites:
The post I made was not intended for initiating a
quarrel. (I know Mani is not saying I did, this is
just to make sure there are no misunderstandings)
If that was my intention I would have
posted it in a different forum. I shared the
question that bothered me and the answer I found
in sri azhagiya singar's writings. Sri azhagiya singar
himself was responding to somebody else's claims.
Therefore, there is no quarrel with saivites.
The point of my post was for sri vaishnavites to not
get confused, like I did, with the term Isvara as used
for Sivan; the point was not to quarrel with saivites.
-- Dileepan
- Next message: Sampath Rengarajan: "Raam Naam Japam, Iswara and Shankaraachaarya"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Isvaran"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
