Re: Isvaran
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 2, 1995
Krish writes: * One cannot understand the concern of Vishnu or Iswara. This is starting to * be like my Christian friend's statement about the only truth and only God. * For every Vaishnava Statement about Vishnu, there is a corresponding one * about Shiva. Whether there is a grain of truth, depends on the devotee! I am not sure what your concern is; don't you believe that ultimately there is only one Truth, and one Supreme God? Your Christian friend is not wrong in this respect. But if he insists that there is only *one* path to that Truth, he is in my view wrong. Each person needs to pick their own path, within some common guidelines. Most learned Vaishnavas will not disagree if you make such a statement. The only question is -- why do Sri Vaishnavas worship Narayana and Narayana alone? We do not thrust the name of Narayana down anyone's throat; that has never been our way. Sri Azhagiya Singar's response to this question is according to our Acharyas' understanding of the Vedas, meditation and surrender to the Being embodied by the concept Narayana is the surest means to everlasting bliss. That is all. This is also confirmed by the Azhvaars' progressive experience of reality. We believe that they are our best guide to knowing the elusive Supreme. Mani
- Next message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Quarrel with saivites"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: letters from Krish@astro.ge.com in gen and Re: Isvaran in particul"
- Maybe in reply to: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Isvaran"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]