Re: Isvaran
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 2, 1995
krish@ASTRO.GE.COM says: >Mr. Algiya Singer seems to be twisting, a right he certainly possesses. Easwara >replies Parvathis's querry. Now Parvathi need not be Easwara's consort, >per Singar. Please read my post carefully. The part about Isvara uvaacha was part of the doubt that I had in MY mind, as clearly stated in the post. I have not stated that srimad azhagiya singar said anything about Parvati's question or Sivan's reply to her. Srimad azhagiya singar was responding to articles that had appeared in Jyaana Boomi and KalaimagaL at that time. He was not looking for a controversy with this article, he was just responding to certain claims. Please read the original article if you must criticize. -- Dileepan
- Next message: Jay.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Re: letters from Krish@astro.ge.com in gen and Re: Isvaran in particul"
- Previous message: krish: "Re: Isvaran"
- Maybe in reply to: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Isvaran"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Isvaran"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]