On Kampa Ramayanam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 27, 2002
Sri: AzhwAr emperumAnAr jeeyar thiruvadikalE Saranam, appan thiruvadikalE Saranam. Dear Group, Dear Group There has been some exchanges on this thread that I have not completely read. Please forgive me for any repetition. According to Sri K. K. A Venkatachari, the first commentator to use Kamba Ramayanam and other tamil classics like Tirukkural and other sangam works (kurunthokai) was Sri Vadakku thiruveedhi pillai in his Idu commentary. Following is a quote from his book "Sri Vaishnava Manipravala" "Explanation via references to social customs is closely related to VatakkuttiruvItippillai's use of proof-texts from Tamil Literature. Cankam works, Tirukkural, Kampan's Ramayanam, Tamil grammar - all are amply quoted" .. "Or he draws from kampan's Ramayanam to give a parallel description for NammAlwar's use of the term KidantavARu (which refers to the recumbent posture of the Lord) in stanza 5:10:6. Commenting on NammAlvAr's description on how lanka was consumed by a fire set by HanumAn, he explains that this is because Agni (the god of Fire) had been subjugated and restrained by RAvana for so long that, feeling liberated at last, he consumed with gusto the island of Lanka." Idu - 5.10.6 Following is just my humble observation. From Pillan to Nanjeeyar the commentary tradition was in a early development stage. They concentrated on specific works like Sri Pillan's 6000 padi or Sri bhattar's tiruneduntandakam or Nanjiyars' 9000 on tiruvaymozhi and other 4 works by alwars. One can see a significant shift in the nature of the commentaries by subsequent acharyas, starting with Nampillai and Vadakku tiruvIdhi pillai, periyavAcAn pillai and so on (Even though, nampillai is not known to have written independent commentaries, he is credited with the work of reproducing Nanjeeyar's 9000 and Idu is also known as Nampillai's work, since it was based on his lectures). The above mentioned later acharyas, have used wide ranging resources to bring out the essence of the works at hand. These acharyas represent a more developed and defined form of commenting on sacred works with the specific purpose of targeting the entire human community, not just the intelligentsia. note: Please refer to Sri K. K. A Venkatachari's book "Sri Vaishnava Manipravala" for an analysis of various acharya's commentaries on Divya Prabhandam. adiyEn Venkatesh Elayavilli -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: narayankv: "Pasuram 1-Part 2- Iramanusa Nootrandhadhi-Velukkudi Swamy Upanyasam"
- Previous message: Lakshmi Narasimhan Venkatapathy: "Re: kamba rAmAyanam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]