On Kampa Ramayanam
From the Bhakti List Archives
elayavalli • Sun Oct 27 2002 - 19:59:36 PST
Sri:
AzhwAr emperumAnAr jeeyar thiruvadikalE Saranam,
appan thiruvadikalE Saranam.
Dear Group,
Dear Group
There has been some exchanges on this thread that I have not
completely read. Please forgive me for any repetition.
According to Sri K. K. A Venkatachari, the first commentator to use
Kamba Ramayanam and other tamil classics like Tirukkural and other
sangam works (kurunthokai) was Sri Vadakku thiruveedhi pillai in his
Idu commentary. Following is a quote from his book "Sri Vaishnava
Manipravala"
"Explanation via references to social customs is closely related to
VatakkuttiruvItippillai's use of proof-texts from Tamil Literature.
Cankam works, Tirukkural, Kampan's Ramayanam, Tamil grammar - all are
amply quoted"
..
"Or he draws from kampan's Ramayanam to give a parallel description
for NammAlwar's use of the term KidantavARu (which refers to the
recumbent posture of the Lord) in stanza 5:10:6. Commenting on
NammAlvAr's description on how lanka was consumed by a fire set by
HanumAn, he explains that this is because Agni (the god of Fire) had
been subjugated and restrained by RAvana for so long that, feeling
liberated at last, he
consumed with gusto the island of Lanka."
Idu - 5.10.6
Following is just my humble observation. From Pillan to Nanjeeyar the
commentary tradition was in a early development stage. They
concentrated on specific works like Sri Pillan's 6000 padi or Sri
bhattar's tiruneduntandakam or Nanjiyars' 9000 on tiruvaymozhi and
other 4 works by alwars. One can see a significant shift in the nature
of the commentaries by subsequent acharyas, starting with Nampillai
and Vadakku tiruvIdhi pillai, periyavAcAn pillai and so on (Even
though, nampillai is not known to have written independent
commentaries, he is credited with the work of reproducing Nanjeeyar's
9000 and Idu is also known as Nampillai's work, since it was based on
his lectures). The above mentioned later acharyas, have used wide
ranging resources to bring out the essence of the works at hand. These
acharyas represent a more developed and defined form of commenting
on sacred works with the specific purpose of targeting the entire
human community, not just the intelligentsia.
note: Please refer to Sri K. K. A Venkatachari's book "Sri Vaishnava
Manipravala" for an analysis of various acharya's commentaries on
Divya Prabhandam.
adiyEn
Venkatesh Elayavilli
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com
Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list
Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: narayankv: "Pasuram 1-Part 2- Iramanusa Nootrandhadhi-Velukkudi Swamy Upanyasam"
- Previous message: Lakshmi Narasimhan Venkatapathy: "Re: kamba rAmAyanam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
