Re: kamba rAmAyanam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 23, 2002
Sri Padmanabhan, I cannot agree with your implication that the Valmiki Ramayana itself is a second tier scripture for Sri Vaishnavas. The comparison to Tiruvaymoli, if one must compare, should be taken only as 'na hi ninda' -- not to put down one but merely to praise the other. Sri Ramanuja studied Srimad Ramayana from Srisaila Purna (Periya Tirumalai Nambi) 18 times and for this reason the latter is regarded as the greatest of Ramanuja's five teachers (SrI-bhAshyakAra-uttama-deSika according to the taniyan). It is also established practice for the devout to recite Srimad Ramayana regularly, even in the Sri Vaishnava community. This hardly lends credence to the view that only 'selected slokas' are worthy of consideration in Valmiki's great epic. None of this of course explains why Kamban is neglected, which was the original question. If anything, Kamban, being a formal Sri Vaishnava, should be even more acceptable, since he writes his Ramayanam as a devout Rama-bhakta with the unquestionable desire to depict Rama as the Supreme God. regards, ramanuja dasan, Mani -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: ramamada gaura das: "Re: Vishnu in Rig Vedam"
- Previous message: Malolan Cadambi: "Re: Answers to Sri Mani + Info repeated again (Anuvaadham)+ Some history"
- In reply to: Padmanabhan: "kamba rAmAyanam"
- Next in thread: Hari Krishnan: "Re: kamba rAmAyanam"
- Reply: Hari Krishnan: "Re: kamba rAmAyanam"
- Reply: Kazhiyur Mannar Narayanan: "Re: kamba rAmAyanam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]