Re: PeriyAzhwAr Thirumozhi- 2.9- This ten is full of Kutti KaNNan's divya cEshtitham
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 10, 2002
SrI: SrImathE Gopaladesika mahadesikaya namah: Dear Sri Muralidhar Swamin, Your anubhavam and highlighting Vaamana, Rama avtaar is also splendid. May I seek your permission to post this to all and let us share this with all others. Thanks for your encouragement on aDiyEn's post. Regards Namo Narayana dAsan ----Original Message Follows---- From: "rangaswamy_m"To: "Madhavakkannan V" Subject: Re: PeriyAzhwAr Thirumozhi- 2.9- This ten is full of Kutti KaNNan's divya cEshtitham Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:39:36 -0000 Sri: SrimatE Gopaladesika MahadesikAya Namaha, Dear Sriman Madhavakkannan Swamin, Thanks a lot for your brilliant posting on the Pasurams of PeriyAzhwar. The verse describing the stealing of butter and the complaints of the Gopis is most moving-particularly, the connection to Lord Vamana and Lord Rama. Kindly permit adiyen some indulgence here from the Gopala Vimshati Upanyasam of H.H. Our Acharya Sarvabhouman declares "There is valid PramANam for Lord Krishna stealing the butter of the gopa damsels. The Lord is foremost among the followers of the Shastras. In the Vamana Avatara, He incarnated as a Brahmachari. Mahabali was an emperor and thus it was most appropriate that our Lord begged of three paces of land from Mahabali. In the Rama Avataram, Our Lord occupied the throne of the Raghus. In other words, He was born to rule-every word and deed of His as Lord Rama bore the hallmark of royalty. Thus, He could command anyone to do His bidding. However, the Lord incarnated as Krishna to demonstrate His Soulabyam (easy accessibility) and thus took birth in the Yadava clan. He was not a king (due to the curse of Yayati that no descendant of Yadu could become a king). Therefore, He could not command anyone to do His bidding. He was not a Brahmin either in this incarnation. On the other hand, the Gopa damsels were common folk. Thus, it was improper for the Lord to beseech them for favours. However, the Lord was undoubtedly SarvEshwaran-the emperor of the entire Universe. Therefore, everything sentient and insentient therein was his rightful property including the butter of the Gopa ladies. Consequently, Lord Krishna invoked His right as SarvEshwaran and stole the butter from the Gopa damsels. " The connection to the Lord of Seven Hills is most evocative. Ten out of the 12 Azhwars have sung the praise of the Lord Srinivasa who stands majestically atop the Venkatachalam Hill showering his Bhaktas with the copious stream of his Daya. A common theme of their outpourings on the Lord of Seven Hills is that of SharaNagati. Thus, the Azhwar's tone of address becomes serious at the mention of Lord Srinivasa. It may be remembered that (1) Swami NammAzhwar, the Prapanna jana Kootasthar performed his formal surrender at the Lotus Feet of Lord Srinivasa (2) Kulashekara Azhwar declares that "PonmalaimEl EdhEnum AvEnE" and "padiyAy kidandhu un pavazhavAy kANbEnE" (3) Swami Alavandar establishes in the Siddhi Trayam that among the three Rahasyams, the Lord of Seven Hills is the Charama Shlokam, which is the most forthright advocation of the doctrine of ShraNagati to His Lotus Feet (4) Sri Ramanujacharya declares in the opening verse of Sri Bhashyam that Lord Srinivasa is the beacon light known as Brahman that shines forth at the head of the Shrutis, i.e., the upanishads "Shruti shirasi vidhIpthE brahmaNi srinivasE" (5) Swami Desikan's stotrams are replete with the usage of prapadhyE. However, in keeping with the above declarations, Swami Desikan commences the Daya Shatakam with PrapadhyE and ends verse 100 with the declaration "mukthAnuBhUthimihadhAsyathimE mukundha:" May the SharaNagatha Rakshakan, Vekatesha (he who presides over the destruction of our sins), known as Lord Srinivasa (who is never separated from Sri both in name as well as due to Thayar's eternal residence in His vakshasthalam), the epitome of Daya, enrich, elevate, ennoble and edify our lives. Thanks again for a superb posting. Namo Narayana, SriMuralidhara Dasan _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: hayagriva mantram"
- Previous message: Narasimhan Krishnamachari: "Vedas first or PerumAL first?"
- Maybe in reply to: Madhavakkannan V: "PeriyAzhwAr Thirumozhi- 2.9- This ten is full of Kutti KaNNan's divya cEshtitham"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]