Vedas first or PerumAL first?
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 11, 2002
Dear SrI Krishna: Thanks for the note. If I had given a different view, that was not what I meant. Since veda-s are the breath of PerumAL, it is obvious that they had to co-exist always, and since PerumAL exists always, vedas exist always. Sorry if I caused a confusion, and thanks again for the clarification. -Krishnamachari --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more faith.yahoo.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Madhavakkannan V: "Re: PeriyAzhwAr Thirumozhi- 2.9- This ten is full of Kutti KaNNan's divya cEshtitham"
- Previous message: Malolan R Cadambi: "Re: The Glory of Tamil [Typo]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]