Ockam's Razor
From the Bhakti List Archives
• October 1, 2001
Mani writes in response to Sri Sadananda's exposition on Wed. Sept. 26: >If you see all your explanations, they posit ideas which >are taken from *outside* the core texts themselves and which >seem opposed to logic. You must be familiar with the principle >of Occam's razor -- when you have two competing theories that >explain the same situation, the one that is simpler is better. Dear Mani, My question concerns your use of the Ockam's razor principle to point out flaws in Advaita. Is there any Sastric justification for this. That is, is the "Rockam's Razor" idea mentioned in our NyAya or Tarka sastras? If not, how are you justified in using it? The second question concerns the principle of Ockam's razor itself. It seems to me that what constitutes a "simpler theory" to explain a certain phenomenon is itself a subjective judgment. To state that the theory that makes fewer assumptions is the right one, assumes that those are the correct assumptions. I think we should emphasize the correctness or reasonable of assumptions rather than focus on their minimization. Our assumptions are often a function of our conditioning and this poses a problem by itself as well. Sincerely, Arun -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: mthirumalai_at_hotmail.com: "Srimath Akkur Andavan Thirunakshatram"
- Previous message: Badrinath D: "Doubt -reg Norms ...."
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Ockam's Razor"
- Maybe reply: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Ockam's Razor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]