Re: UpadEsa Rathna Maalai: Part10(AvathAra Sthalams of AzhwArs:30-33)
From the Bhakti List Archives
• November 11, 1999
SrI: SrI Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmaNE namaha SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaN- SatakOpa SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdESIkAya namaha Dear SrI Sadagopan, namO nArAyaNA. --------------------- You wrote : It appears that in the time of MM , there was a controversy about including RaamAnuja NooranthAdhi in the count of Four Thousand.Responding to this dilemma , MM's disciple, AppiLLai came up with a count of 4000 without the inclusion of AmudhanAr's prabhandham . MM however ruled that the centum devoted to his dear AchArya RaamAnujA should be part of the 4000 count and followed the adhyayana niyamam for this prabhandham in line with the practise for the other Prabhandhams . ------------------- As far as adiyEn's knowledge goes, thennAchArya sampradAyam counts the 4000 pAsurams, without the inclusion of SrI amudhanAr's "rAmAnuja nootrandAdi". But, adiyEn knows for sure that the vadagalai-AchArya sampradAyam counts the 4000 pAsurams with its inclusion. adiyEn requests for clarification in this issue, with respect to the count recognized by thennAchArya sampradAyam. thanks in advance. adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan ananthapadmanAbha dAsan
- Next message: Anand Karalapakkam: "Re: a small clarification"
- Previous message: Rajaram Venkataramani: "RE: "harvest of faith""
- Next in thread: Sadagopan: "Re: UpadEsa Rathna Maalai: Part10(AvathAra Sthalams of AzhwArs:30-33)"
- Maybe reply: Sadagopan: "Re: UpadEsa Rathna Maalai: Part10(AvathAra Sthalams of AzhwArs:30-33)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]