nArAyaneeyam
From the Bhakti List Archives
k.k.raghunathan • Thu Nov 04 1999 - 09:24:37 PST
SrI:
SrI Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmaNE namaha
SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaN-
SatakOpa SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdESIkAya namaha
Dear devotees,
namO nArAyaNA.
SrI Kristijan wanted adiyEn to reply to the questions
he posed sometime back. It was regarding nArAyaNa bhattAdri/
nArAyaneeyam and on vibhava lOkas. Since adiyEn was not
in touch with the bhakti list for few weeks, adiyEn is
answering them now. Sorry for the belated reply.
SrI NArAyaNa BhattAdri (NB), the author of nArAyaneeyam is
not a viSishtAdvaitin. He was following the doctrine
of advaita. He was a vidvAn of those times and has
written works in sAmAnya sAstrAs like mImAmsa. The
glorification of Lord SrI GuruvAyurappan by him is
in accordance with the "SaguNa Brahma upAsana" theory of
the advaitins. For an advaitin, all the three tattvas
viz. God, matter and jIvAtmA are finally unreal and the
only real substance is the "attributeless Brahman". For
them, one has to meditate upon God (SaguNa Brahman) till
one attains the "advaita jn~Ana" that only attributeless
Brahman exists and all else are false. Thus, though
guruvAyurappan is not at all a reality for NB, he glorifies
Lord in accordance with their (absurd ?) philosophy. This
was verified with a SrI Vaishnava vidvAn in Chennai.
SrI Sadagopan wrote :
> SLOKAM 9:
> *********
>
> YATTHU THRIALOKHYA ROOPAM DHADHAPI CHA TATHO NIRGATHO ANANTHA SUDDHA-
> JN~AATHMAA VARTHASE THVAM TAVA KHALU MAHIMAA SOPI THAAVAAN KIMANYATH ?
> STHOKASTHE BHAAGA YEVAAKHILA BHUVANATHAYAA DHRUSYATHE THRAYAMSA KALPAM
> BHUYISHTAM SANDHRA MODHAATHMAKAM UPARI TATHO BHAATHI TASMAI NAMASTHE II
>
> (meaning ): Oh GuruvAyUrappA !You bear the three worlds as
> a part of Your SarIram ( VisishtAdhvaithic concept of SarIra-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> SaarIra mode);even then , You transcend these worlds and stay as
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Suddha satthva svarUpan in Your Parama Padham with indescribable
> glories.
NArAyaNa BhattAdri never advocated ViSishtAdvaita as a
philosophy in his works, ie. never advocated SarIra-
SarIri bhAva between Brahman and cit/acit in his works.
The SarIra-SarIri bhAva, though rooted in vEdAs/Upanishads
is "pradhAna pratitantra" (*) of ViSishtAdvaita as explained
by SwAmi dESIkan in His SrImad Rahasyatraya sAram. Archives
have some postings on SarIra- SarIri bhAvam.
(*): pratitantram refers to a doctrine, which is unique
to a certain school of thought ie. that doctrine
does not belong to any other school of thought.
pradAnam means "most important". The SarIra-SarIri
bhAvam is the most important doctrine, which is
exclusive to the ViSishtAdvaitins.
>
> SlOkam 10:
> **********
>
> AVYAKTHAM thE SVAROOPAM DHURADHIGAMATAMAM TATTHU SUDDHAIKA SATTVAM
> VYAKTHAM CHAPYETHADHEVA SPUTAMAMRUTHA RASAAMBHODHI KALLOLA THULYAM
> SARVOTHKRUSHTAAM ABHEESHTAAM TADHIHA GUNARASENAIVA CHITTHAM HARANTHIM
> MOORTHIM thE SAMSRAYOHAM BHUVANAPURAPATHE PAAHI MAAM KRISHNA RHOGAATH
>
> (MEANING):This is a prayer to Sri KrishNan at the end of this
> dasakam .Oh Lord ! Your attributeless form is difficult to
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> comprehend and meditate upon . Your Suddha sattva-svarUpa archA form
> is very distinctly visible to my human eye here in Your Sannidhi.
> This shining archA form of Yours constituted entirely by Suddha sattvam
> and is like the waves of the ocean of nectar.Therefore , I have
> taken refuge at Your superior archA form , which is the abode of
> anantha kalyANa guNams and is the most effective in attracting
> my mind.Oh Lord of GuruvAyUr ! please save me from all the samsAric
> and physical diseases !
The translation clearly explains the stand of nArAyaNa
bhattAdri (NB) as an advaitin (reference to "attributeless
Brahman"), though adiyEn is not sure as to whether NB refers
to the attributeless Brahman (nirvisEsha Brahman) in this
verse.
nArAyaneeyam can't be recognized as the essence of SrImad
BhAgavatham, because of the presence of advaita as the
fundamental doctrine in it. But, the devotional beauty
(towards the SaguNa Brahman) of many a verses makes some
scholars quote it for just taking the bhagavad anubhavam
aspect of it.
-----------------------
Personal request: Please update your address book ;
adiyEn's hotmail account is no longer in use ;
Kindly use the ID for future
communications. Thanks.
adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan
ananthapadmanAbha dAsan (Anand Karalapakkam)
krishNArpaNam
- Next message: sampath kumar: "once more on "cleanliness" in temples/dd/mutts"
- Previous message: k.k.raghunathan: "vibhava lOkAs"
- Next in thread: Sadagopan: "Re: nArAyaneeyam"
- Maybe reply: Sadagopan: "Re: nArAyaneeyam"
- Maybe reply: k.k.raghunathan: "Re: nArAyaneeyam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
