mAyA sItA - 1
From the Bhakti List Archives
Anand Karalapakkam • Sun Nov 29 1998 - 22:26:00 PST
SrI:
SrImatE Sri Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmanE namaha
SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaNN SatakOpa -
SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdEsikAya namaha
Dear devotees,
namO nArayaNA. pranAmams.
Regarding this mAyA sItA issue, adiyEn would like to share
whatever adiyEn heard from Sri U.Ve.Villur KarunAkaran swAmy,
more than one and a half years ago. Unfortunately, adiyEn
couldn't write before, due to the school schedule/pressure.
The central question is whether rAvanan kidnapped sItA pirAtti
OR he kidnapped some other person (jIvAtmA) disguised as sItA.
Let us get clarified about what "mAyA sItA" means before entering
into further discussion. "mAyA sItA" implies that some jIvAtmA has
taken the form of sItA pirAtti (ie. appears alike). mAyA sItA
doesn't mean that some "illusionary" effect is there as if sItA is
present, while actually she wasn't present. Nothing is unreal /
illusionary in this world. Everything is a reality only.
As many devotees pointed out, there is no mention in SrImad
vAlmIki rAmAyanam about this substitution of sItA pirAtti with
some other person. But, the kidnapping of sItA pirAtti by rAvanA
breaks the heart of all the devotees and we strongly feel to even
kill him if one can. Yes.... No devotee can tolerate such a thing.
A Koorma purAnam verse was quoted by Sri Krishna SusarlA , which
basically tells that rAvanA kidnapped chAyA sItA / mAyA sItA and
not sItA pirAtti. This in a way consoles many devotees who are
disturbed by that act of rAvanan. The main argument from the Gaudiya
VaishnavAs is that sItA pirAtti (who according to them is Internal
Potency / Pleasure potency of Lord Krishna - as per adiyEn's
understanding ) can't be touched by a materialist like rAvanan
who is infact filled with lust.
The substitution if at all took place, is said to have happened as
soon as yiLaya PerumAL (LakshmanA) left sItA pirAtti (ie. just before
rAvanan's appearence for kidnapping). Probably this is what is
portrayed in SrI TulasidAs's rAmAyanam.
But, another rAkshasA named virAdhA kidnapped sItA pirAtti as soon
as they entered dhandakAranyam ( before BharathAzwAn's saraNAgathi
itself).
The following is from GItA Press translation ( adiyEn just heard
the verses through phone from Sri JaganAth. So, the transliteration
may not be perfect) :
Aranya kAndam Ch2 8-13 :
"rAmam lakshmanam chaiva sItAm dhrustvA cha maitilIm
abhyadh dhAvath susam krudhava prajaha kAla yevAntataha
satkrutva bhairavan nAdham chAlayamniva mEdhineem
ankE nAdhAya vaidhEhIm apakramya thadhA braveet
yuvAm jatAchIrAdharou sabAryove ksheena jeevitau
pravishtou dhandakAranyam SarapASipAninou
katam tApa sayOrvO cha rAsaha pramadaya saha
adharmachArinow pApow cow yuvAm munidhooshakow
aham vanamidham durgE virAdhO nAma rAkshasaha
charAmi sAyudhdhO nitya mrushee mAmsAni bakshayam
yeyam nAri varArOhA mama bhAryA bhavishyati
yuvayOhO pApayOschuhAham pArsyAmi ruddhiram mruddhE "
" He saw rAmA,lakshmanA and sItA, the princess of mithilA
and attacked them with great anger, as kAlA,the destroyer
of people attacks them. He made a terrific sound as though
making the earth tremble and took vaidEhi (sItA) in his
arms and went afar and then said :
you two having matted hair and wearing a bark garment
and still having a wife with you ,With your life coming
to an end, having entered the dhandakA forest taking
arrows, bows and sword in your hands. Again how are you
two ascetics staying with a women? Who are you sinners
doing unrightious deeds bringing a blot upon the sages ?
Armed with weapons, I as the rAkshasA named virAdhA,
always wander in this forest which is difficult to access,
eating the flesh of sages. This beautiful lady will become
my wife and I shall drink the blood of you two sinners on
the battle field "
Anyway, afterwards, that rAkshasA was killed. But, the point is
that even virAdhA kidnapped sItA pirAtti with lusty desires. This
took place as soon as they entered dhandakA forest. So, if mAyA
sItA has to be there at this stage also, then the substitution
must have taken place at ayOdhyA itself. Well, then the entire
rAmAyanam becomes meaningless in a way. Infact, sage vAlmIkI
says that whatever he recorded is "sItAyAsch charitam mahat". This
great story is about sItA and not even rAmA. Such an emphasis is
given to the role sItA pirAtti played in the vibhava avatAra
leelA of the Divya Dampati during thrEtA yugA. Infact, trijadai
saraNAgathi at aSoka vanam is a very important incident that
took place at LankA. Only pirAtti has the power of giving moksham
(*) (ofcourse it is given alongwith PerumAL)and some other
jIvAtmA in a disguise as pirAtti can't grant moksham . rAmAyanam
is infact the saraNAgathi vEdam. There are many more important inner
teachings imparted by the Divya Dampati for us through their leelA,
which can be learnt from our AchAryAs.
(*) : That is in accordance with the teachings of SwAmi Desikan.
So, vAlmIki rAmAyanam is very clear in its intent that sItA pirAtti
was kidnapped twice - once by virAdhA and second time by rAvanA.
But, we have another pramAnam (koorma purAnam) which says that
rAvanA kidnapped mAyA sItA. If this were not an interpolated verse,
and is authentic, then it means that in one of the kalpams, during
the rAmAvatAram, mAyA sItA was present instead of sItA pirAtti.
This is known as "kalpa bEdham" . Whenever the portrait of some
incident differs from one sAthvIka purAnam to another (well, can
be extended for other purAnams also in a way), then it means that
those two incidents has taken place at different kalpAs.
adiyEn remembers the materialistic analogy given by Sri KarunAkaran
swAmy. If two statements are there as follows : "India beat West
Indies in the world cup" and "West Indies beat India in the world
cup". Obviously, one has to understand that this refers to different
world cup series/matches and it doesn't refer to the same match.
Since sage vyAsar had the vision of many a things, each time, each
incident was narrated. This is actually a very trivial thing. There
are infinitely many brahmAndAs and in each brahmAndA PerumAL's
avatAram takes place during various kalpams and so many possibilities
of variegatedness are present. So, if some difference in the portrait
of some incidents are there amongst purAnAs(esp.sAthvik), it is
obviously due to kalpa bEdam.
So, mAyA sItA might have been present for one such rAmA avatAram.
As a side note adiyEn would like to tell that the purAnAs are not
there for teaching astronomy, geography etc to us. The main intent of
PurAnAs is to make one understand the various kalyAna gunAs of
PerumAL and esp. the leelAs He personally performed during various
time periods. The main lesson given by the Divya Dampati through
their leelAs is that, whatever be one's status in this material
world, its all only temporary and transient. It has no relevance
to the jIvAtmA. The svaroopam of a jIvAtmA is to serve the Divya
Dampati and to attain Sri VaikuNTham, one has to follow either the
path of bhakti OR prapatti. PurAnAs are filled with the actual
episodes in which the Divya Dampati grants moksham to many such
mumukshus. So, after reading purAnAs, one should get that
vairAgyA (detatchment from materialistic pleasures) and start
devoting oneself for performing kainkaryams to Divya Dampati and
their devotees , following either bhakti yOgA / prapatti.Ofcourse
no one is performing bhakti yOgA (upAsanA) these days. If one
chooses bhakti yOgA, various brahma vidyAs are described in
upanishads and the mumukshu will be highly gaining from vEdAs now.
Sri EngaLAzhwAn (AchAryA of Sri nadAdUr ammAL) infact discusses
this very issue (import of purAnAs) in his brilliant commentry
on Sri Vishnu purAnam. One purAnam gives the distance between
sun and earth as "x" and another purAnam gives some other value.
This is a very trivial thing since purAnam is not meant for
astronomy etc. This is only a very side point and one shouldn't
be bothered about such trivialities.
If Srimad Azhagiyasingar after having some computer scientists
as sishyAs gives some analogy using computer jArgons (after
learning one or two things from His sishyAs), probably some
terminology mistake etc might happen. But, that is not at all
the intent of Azhagiyasingar. It is only an incidental statement.
One should not bang one's head and keep thinking as to why
Azhagiyasingar told "Cobol" while it has to be "Visual C++".
Life is so short and one has to gain the vairAgyA and understand
the sarIra sarIri bhAvam eternally existing between Sriman
nArAyaNA and oneself, and adopt a way to reach Sri VaikuNTham after
realizing that one has wasted all their past lives. The main focus
of the purAnam should not be out of our minds.
One has to understand that even the most opulent rAvanan who had
enormous credits with him due to his tapas (even the dEvAs were
trembling in front of him) was finished off just because of his
lusty desire. A single mistake costed everything.Hiranyakashipu
was ruling this earth and other allied lOkAs for around 71 chatur
yugAs. All the dEvAs were mere servants of him and infact he was
thinking that he was the supreme of all. Not a single vaishnavA
was there in his kingdom except PrahlAdan. But PrahlAdan after
attaining the Brahma jn~Anam from Sage nAradar was always in
rememberance of Sriman nArAyaNA. Even when the whole world was
glorifying Hiranyakasipu as the supreme, PrahlAdA didn't had even
a trace of doubt regarding the fact that Sriman nArAyaNA was
the supreme of all. We then know how the most glorious nrusimha
avatAram took place and how PerumAL finished off Hiranyakasipu.
So, such vairAgyam, jn~Anam and bhakti has to be developed after
hearing purAnams / leelAs of PerumAL which He did specifically
for these very reasons. One shouldn't miss this at any cost.
We shall discuss the philosophical issues concerned with this
mAyA sItA episode in the next posting.
adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan
ananthapadmanAbha dAsan
krishNArpaNam
- Next message: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: "PRAKRITAM AZHAGIYASINGHAR (PART 2)"
- Previous message: Ramesh Sarangapani: "Re: Food For Thought"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
