mAyA sItA - 1
From the Bhakti List Archives
• November 29, 1998
SrI: SrImatE Sri Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmanE namaha SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaNN SatakOpa - SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdEsikAya namaha Dear devotees, namO nArayaNA. pranAmams. Regarding this mAyA sItA issue, adiyEn would like to share whatever adiyEn heard from Sri U.Ve.Villur KarunAkaran swAmy, more than one and a half years ago. Unfortunately, adiyEn couldn't write before, due to the school schedule/pressure. The central question is whether rAvanan kidnapped sItA pirAtti OR he kidnapped some other person (jIvAtmA) disguised as sItA. Let us get clarified about what "mAyA sItA" means before entering into further discussion. "mAyA sItA" implies that some jIvAtmA has taken the form of sItA pirAtti (ie. appears alike). mAyA sItA doesn't mean that some "illusionary" effect is there as if sItA is present, while actually she wasn't present. Nothing is unreal / illusionary in this world. Everything is a reality only. As many devotees pointed out, there is no mention in SrImad vAlmIki rAmAyanam about this substitution of sItA pirAtti with some other person. But, the kidnapping of sItA pirAtti by rAvanA breaks the heart of all the devotees and we strongly feel to even kill him if one can. Yes.... No devotee can tolerate such a thing. A Koorma purAnam verse was quoted by Sri Krishna SusarlA , which basically tells that rAvanA kidnapped chAyA sItA / mAyA sItA and not sItA pirAtti. This in a way consoles many devotees who are disturbed by that act of rAvanan. The main argument from the Gaudiya VaishnavAs is that sItA pirAtti (who according to them is Internal Potency / Pleasure potency of Lord Krishna - as per adiyEn's understanding ) can't be touched by a materialist like rAvanan who is infact filled with lust. The substitution if at all took place, is said to have happened as soon as yiLaya PerumAL (LakshmanA) left sItA pirAtti (ie. just before rAvanan's appearence for kidnapping). Probably this is what is portrayed in SrI TulasidAs's rAmAyanam. But, another rAkshasA named virAdhA kidnapped sItA pirAtti as soon as they entered dhandakAranyam ( before BharathAzwAn's saraNAgathi itself). The following is from GItA Press translation ( adiyEn just heard the verses through phone from Sri JaganAth. So, the transliteration may not be perfect) : Aranya kAndam Ch2 8-13 : "rAmam lakshmanam chaiva sItAm dhrustvA cha maitilIm abhyadh dhAvath susam krudhava prajaha kAla yevAntataha satkrutva bhairavan nAdham chAlayamniva mEdhineem ankE nAdhAya vaidhEhIm apakramya thadhA braveet yuvAm jatAchIrAdharou sabAryove ksheena jeevitau pravishtou dhandakAranyam SarapASipAninou katam tApa sayOrvO cha rAsaha pramadaya saha adharmachArinow pApow cow yuvAm munidhooshakow aham vanamidham durgE virAdhO nAma rAkshasaha charAmi sAyudhdhO nitya mrushee mAmsAni bakshayam yeyam nAri varArOhA mama bhAryA bhavishyati yuvayOhO pApayOschuhAham pArsyAmi ruddhiram mruddhE " " He saw rAmA,lakshmanA and sItA, the princess of mithilA and attacked them with great anger, as kAlA,the destroyer of people attacks them. He made a terrific sound as though making the earth tremble and took vaidEhi (sItA) in his arms and went afar and then said : you two having matted hair and wearing a bark garment and still having a wife with you ,With your life coming to an end, having entered the dhandakA forest taking arrows, bows and sword in your hands. Again how are you two ascetics staying with a women? Who are you sinners doing unrightious deeds bringing a blot upon the sages ? Armed with weapons, I as the rAkshasA named virAdhA, always wander in this forest which is difficult to access, eating the flesh of sages. This beautiful lady will become my wife and I shall drink the blood of you two sinners on the battle field " Anyway, afterwards, that rAkshasA was killed. But, the point is that even virAdhA kidnapped sItA pirAtti with lusty desires. This took place as soon as they entered dhandakA forest. So, if mAyA sItA has to be there at this stage also, then the substitution must have taken place at ayOdhyA itself. Well, then the entire rAmAyanam becomes meaningless in a way. Infact, sage vAlmIkI says that whatever he recorded is "sItAyAsch charitam mahat". This great story is about sItA and not even rAmA. Such an emphasis is given to the role sItA pirAtti played in the vibhava avatAra leelA of the Divya Dampati during thrEtA yugA. Infact, trijadai saraNAgathi at aSoka vanam is a very important incident that took place at LankA. Only pirAtti has the power of giving moksham (*) (ofcourse it is given alongwith PerumAL)and some other jIvAtmA in a disguise as pirAtti can't grant moksham . rAmAyanam is infact the saraNAgathi vEdam. There are many more important inner teachings imparted by the Divya Dampati for us through their leelA, which can be learnt from our AchAryAs. (*) : That is in accordance with the teachings of SwAmi Desikan. So, vAlmIki rAmAyanam is very clear in its intent that sItA pirAtti was kidnapped twice - once by virAdhA and second time by rAvanA. But, we have another pramAnam (koorma purAnam) which says that rAvanA kidnapped mAyA sItA. If this were not an interpolated verse, and is authentic, then it means that in one of the kalpams, during the rAmAvatAram, mAyA sItA was present instead of sItA pirAtti. This is known as "kalpa bEdham" . Whenever the portrait of some incident differs from one sAthvIka purAnam to another (well, can be extended for other purAnams also in a way), then it means that those two incidents has taken place at different kalpAs. adiyEn remembers the materialistic analogy given by Sri KarunAkaran swAmy. If two statements are there as follows : "India beat West Indies in the world cup" and "West Indies beat India in the world cup". Obviously, one has to understand that this refers to different world cup series/matches and it doesn't refer to the same match. Since sage vyAsar had the vision of many a things, each time, each incident was narrated. This is actually a very trivial thing. There are infinitely many brahmAndAs and in each brahmAndA PerumAL's avatAram takes place during various kalpams and so many possibilities of variegatedness are present. So, if some difference in the portrait of some incidents are there amongst purAnAs(esp.sAthvik), it is obviously due to kalpa bEdam. So, mAyA sItA might have been present for one such rAmA avatAram. As a side note adiyEn would like to tell that the purAnAs are not there for teaching astronomy, geography etc to us. The main intent of PurAnAs is to make one understand the various kalyAna gunAs of PerumAL and esp. the leelAs He personally performed during various time periods. The main lesson given by the Divya Dampati through their leelAs is that, whatever be one's status in this material world, its all only temporary and transient. It has no relevance to the jIvAtmA. The svaroopam of a jIvAtmA is to serve the Divya Dampati and to attain Sri VaikuNTham, one has to follow either the path of bhakti OR prapatti. PurAnAs are filled with the actual episodes in which the Divya Dampati grants moksham to many such mumukshus. So, after reading purAnAs, one should get that vairAgyA (detatchment from materialistic pleasures) and start devoting oneself for performing kainkaryams to Divya Dampati and their devotees , following either bhakti yOgA / prapatti.Ofcourse no one is performing bhakti yOgA (upAsanA) these days. If one chooses bhakti yOgA, various brahma vidyAs are described in upanishads and the mumukshu will be highly gaining from vEdAs now. Sri EngaLAzhwAn (AchAryA of Sri nadAdUr ammAL) infact discusses this very issue (import of purAnAs) in his brilliant commentry on Sri Vishnu purAnam. One purAnam gives the distance between sun and earth as "x" and another purAnam gives some other value. This is a very trivial thing since purAnam is not meant for astronomy etc. This is only a very side point and one shouldn't be bothered about such trivialities. If Srimad Azhagiyasingar after having some computer scientists as sishyAs gives some analogy using computer jArgons (after learning one or two things from His sishyAs), probably some terminology mistake etc might happen. But, that is not at all the intent of Azhagiyasingar. It is only an incidental statement. One should not bang one's head and keep thinking as to why Azhagiyasingar told "Cobol" while it has to be "Visual C++". Life is so short and one has to gain the vairAgyA and understand the sarIra sarIri bhAvam eternally existing between Sriman nArAyaNA and oneself, and adopt a way to reach Sri VaikuNTham after realizing that one has wasted all their past lives. The main focus of the purAnam should not be out of our minds. One has to understand that even the most opulent rAvanan who had enormous credits with him due to his tapas (even the dEvAs were trembling in front of him) was finished off just because of his lusty desire. A single mistake costed everything.Hiranyakashipu was ruling this earth and other allied lOkAs for around 71 chatur yugAs. All the dEvAs were mere servants of him and infact he was thinking that he was the supreme of all. Not a single vaishnavA was there in his kingdom except PrahlAdan. But PrahlAdan after attaining the Brahma jn~Anam from Sage nAradar was always in rememberance of Sriman nArAyaNA. Even when the whole world was glorifying Hiranyakasipu as the supreme, PrahlAdA didn't had even a trace of doubt regarding the fact that Sriman nArAyaNA was the supreme of all. We then know how the most glorious nrusimha avatAram took place and how PerumAL finished off Hiranyakasipu. So, such vairAgyam, jn~Anam and bhakti has to be developed after hearing purAnams / leelAs of PerumAL which He did specifically for these very reasons. One shouldn't miss this at any cost. We shall discuss the philosophical issues concerned with this mAyA sItA episode in the next posting. adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan ananthapadmanAbha dAsan krishNArpaNam
- Next message: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: "PRAKRITAM AZHAGIYASINGHAR (PART 2)"
- Previous message: Ramesh Sarangapani: "Re: Food For Thought"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]