Musings on sita's agni-pravEsam#6
From the Bhakti List Archives
• November 23, 1998
Dear Sri.S.H.Krishnan and other members (who are following this thread), I am sorry we got interrupted after post#5 and side-tracked into a rather digressive discussion on a line I just happened to quote from Swami Desikan's "Raghu-veera gadyam". Let's get on now with the central task at hand: our enjoyment of the scene of the "agni-pravesam" from Valmiki Ramayanam. I strongly suspect that perhaps all of you secretly wish to ask me a question but are too polite to do so and it is this: "In discussing the subject of the Ramayana's "agni-pravEsam" why should I engage you all in a discussion that has gone on now for more than 5 long, seemingly tedious and interminable posts? Can't I simply get to the point instead of beating around the "itihAsic" bush, quoting all manner and specie of ancient and modern poets, East and West, and inflicting on you all the most convoluted, elliptical and long-winded perorations which a pompous but literary-minded windbag can pull out of the same sleeve on which he flaunts his half-knowledge?" Let me confess to you all, dear members, that I simply cannot help it. If you read Valmiki's verses, even with scant knowledge of Sanskrit, you too, like me, would tend to lose yourself in a heady reverie of poetic enjoyment and philosophical reflection. A trigger-happy, highly wrought imagination such as mine only makes things worse, for I sometimes I find myself virtually hallucinating about the vivid scenes from the Ramayana. A lot of associative and dissociative ideas and allusions too begin to buzz and dance inside my mind. Let me tell you a truth about myself. I do not enjoy the Ramayana in the spirit of a scholar or a religious devotee. Neither true scholar nor "bhakta" am I. Instead I approach the epic in parts as a child that looks forward, daily and excitedly, to riveting tales that a wizened grandma re-tells to it after dinner, and in other parts, just as an ardent "rasika" secretly wishing he were a performing 'vidwAn' so as to be able to secure a fuller, richer experience of some rare Thyagaraja "kriti"! I am well aware that everyone of you is well-read and well-informed about the Ramayana. Also, the episode of Sita's "agni-pravEsam" is as old as the hills. Everything worth commenting on and reflecting about it, has already been said and recorded by great souls of the past like Sri.Tirumalai-nambi, Kamban, Kalidasan, Tulsidas, Swami Desikan, Govindaraja .... and in our own times by towering minds like Tilak, Rajaji, Rt.Hon'ble Srinivasa Sastri and Prof.K.R.Srinivasa Iyengar. There is nothing really new or original in the episode that I am going to especially wring out and share with you all. So why then, you might ask, why then my lengthy, discursive essays on "sitA's agni-pravEsam"? Why, indeed! Perhaps I'd do better to simply stick to bare, antiseptic facts. Perhaps I should say whatever I have to say about the episode in the dry, direct, matter-of-fact and dead-pan style of a lead-editorial under the gaunt mast-head of a staid conservative daily like the "Hindu" or "Times of India". Yes? Perhaps, yes, that's precisely what I should be doing in my posts on the "bhakti-list". It would certainly save everyone's time, breath and band-width! But then again I ask myself, "Would I enjoy discussing the Ramayana in such a drab and lack-lustre manner?". Would I do justice to the great tale of the Ramayana if I did not attempt to re-produce it to my friends on the "bhakti-list" with at least half the joy, painstake, and vividness with which I'd heard it from my own grandmother years and years ago? Would I not relish it so much more if I re-narrated the edifying episode of the "agni-pravEsam" with the embellishment of my own little experiences of life? Would I not acquire for myself a little deeper insight than before into the lofty characters of Rama, Sita or Hanuman if I re-visited all over again the whole episode of the "agni-pravEsam" just as if I were setting out to do so for the first time in my life? Would I not by that act cleanse my own faculties of perception and understanding..... what they call "chitta-suddhi"....? And in that process is there not half a chance that your own --- readers' --- "chitta-suddhi" too might be enabled or facilitated ? And is that not the true purpose for which we have all formed a faceless, otherwise impersonal, "cyber-community" (called the "bhakti-list") amongst ourselves across continents and seas and is that not why we daily share and exchange ideas and thoughts with each other? Believe me, dear members, to follow the story of the Ramayana --- and the episodes in it like the "agni-pravEsam" --- is in itself a personal voyage of self-discovery that each of us must undertake on our own. The commentaries of the Masters of the past will help us in this endeavour, no doubt, like milestones and motels along the way. But the course of the journey itself and the various sights and scenes it will present us on the way, please remember, that journey itself will be very much our own. It is a uniquely individual and intensely private understanding of truth of the Ramayana that we reach ourselves. I might be guilty of trying your patience, dear members, by posting my rather long-winded posts on this subject. But it's the only way I can enjoy the Ramayana and draw edification from it. I know no other way. If you have the time and patience to accompany me a little distance on my journey, you are most welcome. I do not promise you any great or fantastic sight-seeing...... I can only promise you the next instalment of my "Musings on "sitA's agni-pravEsam" in a few days from now. adiyEn dAsAnu dAsan, sudarshan
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Tiruppavai Verse # 2"
- Previous message: sriram.ranganathan_at_funb.com: "Re:Musings on sitA's agni-pravEsam#5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]