Azhwars
From the Bhakti List Archives
• November 26, 1997
The recent postings on Azhwars expressing views, opinions and facts have been enlightening for a novitiate Sri Vaishnava like me. I cannot even come close to quote book references or Acharyas upanyaasams like many of you are fortunate to be able to do so. What I am expressing is from my heart (overriding the mind), which may get me into trouble. Prior to the recent postings I considered Azhwars as above mortals like us. I have considered them (and will continue to) as amsams of Sriman Narayana's weapons. I did not worry whether they are Nitya Suris or baddha jeevaathmaas. In our PerumaaL Sannidhi, we keep the pictures of Acharyas and Azhwars. We offer our respects to them. We do not have all the Azhwars or Acharys pictures. When we do, we will place it besides the PerumaaL pictures and continue with what we have been doing. Although, I have a doubt how AndaaL is considered, or is this discussion/debate relevant only to Mudal Azhwars? Does it make a difference to me how Azhwars are considered in vadagalai or thengalai saampradaayam? Not really. Should we impose the kalai differences on the youth growing up here? Definitely not. Is it beneficial to know the differences from a purely academic point of view? Probably to certainly. Is it worth the negative energy to challenge or question someone's opinion? Not in my complex world. Is there a right or wrong answer to these type of debates? My opinion is that most of the time they end up inconclusive, with potential wounding of beliefs of individuals. Do I get into arguments with individuals wrt my beliefs? Of Course. Where are we going with this debate? If it is to share the perspectives, references and interpretations, then it may be beneficial to learn the diverse analytical basis. This hopefully facilitates us to look objectively at different perspectives, without getting defensive or emotional. If you ask youth born and raised in USA, most of them do not know what "kalai" means, and are not emotional about the subject. The emotional debate is often among members whose formidable years were in India, influenced by local situations. Do we have opportunities to emphazise (and be successful) about our common binding theme of Ramanuja Siddhantham? Yes, if handled appropriately, within the framework of the logical learning process. Sri Sadagopan mentioned re Sri Madhav Kannan's valuable contribution through his postings on Azhwars', to help the young. Incidentally, I have used the material from that series of postings to have children present the Lives of Azhwars at NAMA functions. This is the type of service we need to be doing to start at the grass roots level. Like someone asked a question recently, I too am struggling with "what is Apachaaram?" I tend to be impulsive and direct. Even I have been hesitant to convey my feelings to avoid "labeling." By the by, nobody has approached me or advised me on this subject. Purely my self-imposed constraints. We may defeat the purpose of this group to share our knowledge on Sri Vaishnava Philosophy by emphasizing potential Apachaaram. I share the concern with Sri Vijayaraghavan that we may discourage youth (and adults) from participating in this type of internet or personal discussions. (I recognize that there is no set answer to this problem.) Re Sri Bhuvanachaarya, I have heard he is very knowledgable person. In fact, since the announcement of the December Conference, I have been asked by a few NAMA members whether I would be able to organize a visit by him to meet with Sri Vaishnavas. The fact he is not as well known does not surprise me. Most knowledgable and learned scholars tend to be humble and modest. Their goal is to share knowledge without worrying about the fact that they are not that well known. I believe Sri Bhuvanacharya fits into that category. Historically, in most religions, it is the over-enthusiastic followers of any leader/Acharyas that tend to start friction and divisiveness. Finally, it is extremely important that each and every one of us try our best to practice what we preach, other wise we will continue to erode our community. I want to reiterate that I do not intend to attack any person or personalities. I would just like to address the issues the way I comprehend. Nagu Satyan satyan@worldnet.att.net 303-973-4847
- Next message: V.Madhavakkannan: "Excellence- Thy name is sadagopan"
- Previous message: Sridhar Srinivasan: "Re: ALWARS_ NITYASOORIS OR BHADDA JIVATMAS ?"
- Next in thread: Thirumalai Anandanpillai: "Re: Azhwars"
- Reply: Thirumalai Anandanpillai: "Re: Azhwars"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]