RE: Azhwars Nitya suris or baddha jivatmas
From the Bhakti List Archives
• November 23, 1997
I originally did not intend to participate in this discussion, as I have little knowledge of the subject. But, Sri Ramaswamy's recent comments have brought back some thoughts I had during the original discussion, which I would like to share with all of you. What I am about to present is not at all a traditional view, so please take this for what it is worth. But, with all due respects to Sri Ramaswamy, Sri Dileepan, and the other erudite members of this forum, I feel that Mani's statement, "One needs to dig deeper and more broadly into our Puravacharya's works to see how they viewed the Alwars" is implying something more than just the superficial implication for further study. I would suggest that this delving be a more spiritual one, reaching out more to our emotions than our logic. The debate - or should I say, paradox - as to the divinity or humanity of saints and religious leaders is quite a common one among the theistic, devotion based philosophies. Take for example the Catholic Church in their adoration of Mary. The Church portrays Mary as the Divinely Ordained Holy Mother, the one who in her compassion acts as the mediary between Christ and humanity. But, at the same time, Mary, the human mother of Jesus, is also known as the one who cries as only a mother could at the suffering and untimely demise of her son. Interestingly, the Church is able to accept both, the the sad plight of the human side of Mary and the exalted role of Mary the "purusakAram." For in a sense, her very role as the Compassionate Mediator for Her Divine Son results out of her own human experience, as she can certainly empathize with what it means to go through this samsAram. Similar views can be found "closer to home," too. In my plethora of readings in college on the subject, I came across a brief blurb about what I believe is a popularly held view in the Ramanandi tradition. It stated that the Lord chose to incarnate as Sri Rama not only out of His Saulabhyam, but to truly show us how much He can understand and empathize with what it means to be human. To me, this is a beautiful concept, which makes us enjoy Him even more! Similar ideas are suggested in our own KurattazhwAn's ati mAnusa stavam. I would like to suggest that a similar mood be taken in the appreciation and adoration of the AzhwArs. Whether or not the AzhwArs were born Divine, or whether the Lord descended into them later will always be based on how one looks at it. But, the facts remain from their lives that they knew all too well about the trials, tribulations, goods and bads of being human, and in their own Divine outpourings both beseeched and wondered at the Kindness of He who saved them from all of this. It is only in the recognition of this undeniably human experience that we can see the the fullness of His Saulabhyam. Please forgive me for any offenses made in my unqualified ramblings. dAsan Mohan Raghavan
- Next message: V. Sadagopan: "Meaning of the DhyAna SlOkam of Mula Manthram"
- Previous message: VVijay236_at_aol.com: "ALWARS_ NITYASOORIS OR BHADDA JIVATMAS ?"
- Maybe in reply to: Bharadwaj, Jaganath: "Azhwars Nitya suris or baddha jivatmas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]