Re: Jnana and bhakti
From the Bhakti List Archives
• November 5, 1996
Dear Martin and others, The relationship between jnAna and bhakti is a very important issue in the process of sAdhana. Krishna has addressed the issue of whether self-knowledge to the point of the experience of the bliss of the self is a necessary prerequisite to jnAna. Mohan from Colorado has also addressed one part of this question. However, I think some of his points may be misunderstood if taken literally. For the prapanna (one who has surrendered everything to the Lord), there is no *need* for meditation as a means to liberation, but meditation can still be performed as a natural expression of devotion and is certainly beneficial to one's well-being. One must be careful in performing this meditation not out of an egoistic attitude but as an outgrowth of love and service. That being said, meditation in the Upanishadic sense can always (and probably should always) be a part of the devotional process. Nammalvar, whose life and poetry furnishes the finest example of self-surrender for followers of the Vedas, was involved in deep meditation of the Lord nearly all his life. The panca-kAla-prAkriya (five-fold division of daily duties) of the Sri Vaishnavas includes yoga as an integral element. At the very minimum, a basic knowledge of the nature of the self is requisite for the prapanna. Our acharyas hold that knowledge of the nature of the self, if not of the self itself, is necessary for the surrender to truly be complete. This may be termed 'sesatva-jnAna', or the understanding that the individual exists solely for the purpose of the glory of the Lord and merely operates as His mode. Mani
- Next message: M Srinivasan: "(no subject)"
- Previous message: M K Sudarshan: "daya and its synonyms"
- Maybe in reply to: Martin Gansten: "Jnana and bhakti"
- Next in thread: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: Jnana and bhakti"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]