Few questions
From the Bhakti List Archives
• November 7, 2002
Dear Pradeep While I dont want to comment on your analogy but still would like and love to add few rejoinders .. please read further... > At a more unified theory level, non-controversial people would say > that "Nirgunam" and "Sagunam" are like the 2-sides of a paper. _________________________________________________________________ --- I would like to know what the contreversy is all about..and who the controversial and non controversial people are ???.. -:) _____________________________________________________________________________________ > Just as the paper definitely has 2-sides and appears based on which > > side and how we look at it, Lord also is both "Nirgunam" (wihtout > Rajas,and Tamas gunas) and yet "Sagunam" posessing Ananta-Kalyaana-Gunams. > _______________________________________- There are some fallacies (as I see) in the above .... So I shall put them as questions and intend to start off another thread.... 1) What do the terms Nirgunam and Sagunam exactly Mean?? 2) Are they antonyms?? 3) As according to the statement above does it mean that the absence of Rajas and Tamas gunas alone is nirgunam?? 4) So what about Sathva Guna?? Why the same hasnt been included(listed).. ?? 5) If Satva Guna is not included does it mean presence of (Sudha) satvam is Nirgunam?? 6) If it is a typo and so you feel that Satva guna must have been included(listed).. can we take that absence of such gunas themselves as a way to to distinguish between a Saguna entity and Nirguna entity?? 7) If so dont you feel absence of "Gunams" itself a Gunam for a Nirguna entity?? ___________________________________________ > (the last paragraph is not my personal view, but I have heard the > above being said by quite a few pravachana-kartaas) > > Radhe Krishna > > -- Pradeep ------- IMHO the content and saaraamsam of pravachanams by many pravachana karthas are heavily dependednt on time place and audience. you may see at times the same pravachana kartha would be establishing different view (s) from one place to the other. regards Venkat -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Krishna K: "RE: Fw: Images of Religion"
- Previous message: Shreekrishna Akilesh: "Re: kamba rAmAyanam"
- Next in thread: VLN: "Re: Few questions"
- Reply: VLN: "Re: Few questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]