Re: Idol worship and Vedas???
From the Bhakti List Archives
kuntimaddi sadananda • Fri Nov 01 2002 - 04:40:20 PST
No body in the right mind worships idols - What is worshiped is the
ideal behind the idols. When we salute a piece of cloth with colors
pained on it, and chant National Anthem, we are saluting the nation
that is symbolized by the flag. It is not the piece of cloth that we
are saluting. When Lord is all pervading, evey form is His form and
any form can be his symbol for those who have the right vision of the
Lord. What is worshpped is Him not the symbol per sec. In any puja,
we do aavaahanam and once we invite the great Lord and we offer
everthinig that makes his stay comfortable - paaniiyam, aasanam,
aarghyam, vastram and naivedyam, madhye madhye paaniiyam to drink,
taambuulam and after the puuja is over visargam - saying bye bye. If
we do all this when we invite to some chief politician coming to the
town, with how much care and devotion one has to do when we invite
the Lord of the entire universe.
It is unfortunate Arya Samaj or Brahma samaaj have not understood the
significance of what Idol worship means. I am sure Dayananda
Saraswati who started this meaningless samaj, must have had some
reverence to his parents. Was he not a idol worshiper when he was
respecting the photos of his parents. When simple piece of painted
paper invokes so much love and respect, idol consecreted with due
pratishhTa should invoke reverse to that great Lord that is
symbolized in that idol. Vedas teache us how to do proper worship.
But what is needed is Bhakti - devotion to the Lord. Without that
Bhakti, it becomes some mechanical exercise.
Hari OM1
Sadananda
[ I think Sri Sadananda's explanation differs significantly
from the Pancaratra and Sri Vaishnava idea of the arcAvatAra.
It is a misreading of our religious practice so say that the
Pancaratra concept of the arca mUrti, denoted as "idol" for
the sake of writing in English, is merely an "ideal" or "symbol",
or a means of concentration, as is so often declared by
modern interpreters. No doubt the rejection of idol worship by
the Arya and Brahmo Samaj is also a modern development, a reaction
to outside criticism and internal hypocrisy in the wider Indian
context; however neo-Vedantins such as Swami Vivekananda and
Swami Chinmayananda who categorically pushed the arca mUrti into
the realm of mere symobology have also erred and unfortunately
did a great disservice to the ideas and concepts implicit in this
form of religious devotion.
To both lay and scholarly Sri Vaishnavas, the arca or idol
is indistinguishable from God. God manifests Himself or
Herself as the temple image to grace those who worship the
image in the most convenient way possible. It reflects the
supreme desire of God to be accessible to His devotees that
makes the idol at one with the highest principle of Godhead.
To borrow terminology from Western religious tradition, one
can say that the very stuff of the idol is transsubstantiated
so that seeing the idol as a mere symbol, mere stone, or
mere metal is considered a grave sin.
There is a difference between worship of symbols, denoted in
Vedanta as 'pratIka', and worship of a manifestation of God.
The former are temporary conveniences for the sake of meditation.
Commandments such as "worship the mind as the Supreme", "worship
the life breath as Supreme", "worship desire as the Supreme",
etc., are pedagogical techniques described in Upanishads to take the
student slowly but surely to the eventual meditation on the Supreme
Itself.
Temple and home-based image worship, however, is very different.
The Pancaratra Agamas and other scripturs that prescribe the
use such worship specifically state that image is a manifestation
of God. In this sense, the image itself literally *is* God; this
is what lends meaning to the term "arca-avatara",
an _incarnation_ of God in the form of an idol. (This is a concept
that even thinkers outside the Pancaratra school have accepted
wholeheartedly. Sri Sankaracharya writes several times in his
Brahma Sutra Bhashya, "yathA sAlagrAme hariH", "sAlagrama iva vishNoH",
"yathA sAlagrAme vishNuH sannihitaH, tadvat".) Learned members
who are well versed in Sri Vachana Bhushana and other works of
our acharyas are invited to wax eloquently about the greatness
of the idea behind the arcAvatAra to illustrate these concepts further.
Because of Western and Semitic criticism, we as middle class, English
speaking moderners have become scared of the term "idol" and afraid of
the grand concept of arcAvatAra and idol worship. Such fear is absent
in followers of our religion who are blissfully unaware of such
criticism. One can only look at the average, common, non-English
educated worshipper at any of the Vishnu and Siva temples in South
India. To a person such as this who has worshipped at, say the
shrine of Lord Ranganatha in Srirangam, a question such as "Have you
seen God?" that has made at least one neo-Vedantin famous would seem
patently absurd.
-- Moderator ]
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com
Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list
Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Nanmaaran: "Re: Idol worship and Vedas???"
- Previous message: Aravind Gopalan: "Re: Idol worship in vedas"
- Next in thread: Nanmaaran: "Re: Idol worship and Vedas???"
- Maybe reply: Nanmaaran: "Re: Idol worship and Vedas???"
- Reply: balaji srinivasan: "Re: Idol worship and Vedas???"
- Maybe reply: Visu9_at_aol.com: "Re: Idol worship and Vedas???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
