Re: srichoorna paripAlanai- reason
From the Bhakti List Archives
• November 18, 2001
Following up to adiyEn's post on this subject. I think one needs to clarify the concept of "being sufficient". I don't think anyone contests that it is Sriman Narayana that gives mOksha. In that sense, Acharya sambandam alone would be insufficient. However, it is our pUrvAcharya stance that once an acharya intercedes on behalf of a jIvan, He does not permit Himself the choice of not giving mOksha to that jIvan. That person therefore does not have to directly plead their case (in whatever fashion) to Him. In that sense, Acharya sambandam is sufficient. An interesting point from Kanninun Siruththambu vyakyanam that adiyEn talked about earlier. Sri Periyavaccan Pillai says that Sri Madhurakavi Azhvar does not take his stance based on Sastric fact or from his Acharyas upadEsam. He only states this based on his acharyas tiruvadi sambandam. For him that alone proved to be enough: both in terms of proof as well as what he needed to attain. In our case, we would continue to lack sastric fact, but we do have acharya upadEsam for this (all our acharyas starting from Sri Madhurakavi Azhvar onward). The other interesting fact about this is that this upadEsam starts coming to us right around the time the Kali yuga started. Therein perhaps lies a point that Acharya sambandam is most important in this period. adiyEn madhurakavi dAsan TCA Venkatesan ===== Email: mailto:vtca@yahoo.com TCA Venkatesan: http://www.acharya.cc -- Srivaishnava Sampradhayam: http://www.acharya.org For latest changes to this site, click on http://www.acharya.org/whatsnew.html __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Sadagopan: "Sri Varadaraja Sthvam: part XXV: SlOkm 14"
- Previous message: D Bala Sundaram: "Caste and conversions"
- In reply to: sridhar .S: "Re: srichoorna paripAlanai- reason"
- Next in thread: TCA Venkatesan: "Re: srichoorna paripAlanai- reason"
- Reply: TCA Venkatesan: "Re: srichoorna paripAlanai- reason"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]