Re: Non-Brahmin origin of some Iyengars?
From the Bhakti List Archives
• November 13, 2001
Sri Kandaswami, It is not true that Sri Ramanuja went about changing non Brahmins to Brahmins or vice versa. He was a strict vedantin, yet had a clear vision of social justice. He simply followed the footsteps of Vedas, Satvika puranas , Bhagvat Gita where there are number of illustrations to prove that Supreme Lord is attainable irrespective one's caste or sex. Till Sri ramanajuar's times, Caste and Sex were considered important requirements for one to attain deliverance, the myth Sri Ramanuja disproved. However, I feel this popular beleif of ' Conversions??' came to being due to following reasons. 1. Some biographers who wanted to eulogize Sri Ramanuja of his greater social vision, gave this exaggerated account . 2. During the height of Kalai disputes some 50-60 years back, it was normal for one kalai to tell the other kalai that they are so and so... (What these followers of Ramanuja failed to understand is that one has to be proud of being a Vaishnavite rather than a mere Brahmin which does not guarantee any deliverance) For instance the followers of Tennacharya sampradayam (This name has come because majority of them were from South, i.e. Srirangam as opposed to Kanchi or Mandya, which is North) cited that the other kalai has very few acharyas in the guru parampara lineage to boast and hence they are outsiders and they have identity crisis. The Vadakalai followers pointed out non performance of certain Naimitya karmas by other group and said other one is so and so... 3. The Third category of people are, Smartas, who could not substantiate Advaitam by any logical reasoning(Thanks to works like Sri Bashyam and Sata Dhusini.) , ended up with these sort of name calling out of desperation. For Smartas, it is more important to be a Brahmin than any body else. However for a Sri Vaishnava, (for both kalais), it is important to be more devoted to Lord and his Kalyana gunas first then anything else. The degree and extent may vary from one kalai to other depending on interpretation of Rahasya grantas by respective acharyas. These sort of name calling is promiment only among the less educated ,less matured people of both kalais and smartas and cannot be seen from learned people. To end my post, I am fully convinced that one has to be proud of BEING a Vasihnava and not for being born in a Brahmin family . Regards KM Narayanan -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: venkat sreenivasan: "HH Srirangam Srimath Andavan's Deepavali Message - A Translation"
- Previous message: Chivukula NSK Murthy: "Joining Introduction"
- Maybe in reply to: Ashegan Shastri: "Non-Brahmin origin of some Iyengars?"
- Next in thread: Mohan Sagar: "Re: Non-Brahmin origin of some Iyengars?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]