Re: srichoorna paripAlanai- reason
From the Bhakti List Archives
• November 9, 2001
srImathE rAmAnujAya namaha srImadh varavara munayE namaha Dear Sri Mani Probably what Sri MAV mentioned and what Smt Sheela paraphrased as "mOksha due to Sri rAmAnuja sambhandam" comes from the well know incident mentioned in the Guruparampara prabhAvams, where Sriman nArAyaNan declared mOksham, out of ecstasy, to all who have rAmAnuja sambhandam. This, however, does not invalidate your point that, it is only the grace of Sriman nArAyaNan which will enable the jeevAtmA to attain mOksham. The first statement is more out of compassion towards swamy emberumAnAr, by emberumAn Himself. So both are to be considered as parallels, though the former, as you said, is not necessary. But sufficiency.....?, yes, it is the word of emberumAn Himself. So the possibility is very much there that it is sufficient. But the point to be remembered is that, just undergoing pancha samskaram and claiming that we have received the rAmAnuja sambhandam is utterly wrong. Yes, we might have gained the sambhandam but we have to sustain it with our "krtya karaNAs"(prescribed deeds). This is more like the saying that " Sustaining is more difficult than Getting the ISO Certification". Needless to explain here what is ISO certification. AzhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyar thiruvadigaLE saraNam adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan Thirumalai Vinjamoor Venkatesh -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Mohan T L: "Re: The Last Thought"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Dr. NSA's next lecture on Saranagati Gadyam"
- Maybe in reply to: Sheela Belur: "srichoorna paripAlanai- reason"
- Next in thread: sridhar .S: "Re: srichoorna paripAlanai- reason"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]