Re: mAyA sItA
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 28, 1999
Sri Vishnu wrote: > This mAyA sItA vruttAntam, which finds place in purANas > (BhavishyOttara/vArAha?), was quoted by BhagavadrAmAnuja in his arguments > with the Saivas of Tirupati region. As stated earlier, acharyas in the Sri Vaishnava tradition do not accept the Maya Sita story. If it has been reported that Ramanuja used this story at Tirupati, this must be a recent revision of history. According to the earliest biographies, there are few details of what arguments Ramanuja actually made, and the Maya Sita story would have had little if any relevance to the dispute. Sri Vaishnava acharyas stick to Srimad Valmiki Ramayanam and Alvar paasurams for the story of Rama. For additional anubhavas, they read Kamban, whose story is based entirely on Valmiki, by his own admission. We are best advised to do the same. Mani
- Next message: Sadagopan: "(no subject)"
- Previous message: Venkat Nagarajan: "Queries"
- Maybe in reply to: V.Srimahavishnu: "mAyA sItA"
- Next in thread: Anand Karalapakkam: "Re: mAyA sItA"
- Reply: Anand Karalapakkam: "Re: mAyA sItA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]