Darwin's theory etc
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 13, 1999
Dear BhAgavatOttamAs In SrI BhAshya Swami EmberumAnAr says quoting the ParamAchArya,. All observable facts and all the Physical Laws are to be taken as correct.But it does not mean that all the "theories" of Scientists are to be taken as true.It doesn't happen like that in the world of Scientists itself.If A gives out a theory and B comes out with its opposite (as happens frequently),the latter does not automatically invalidate the former as one would logically expect to happen.By an unwritten Code of Conduct,both the theories mentioned side by side and the reader is allowed to make his own choice. Are such "theories" comparable to the intuitive "sights" of our ancient Rshis? Incidentally when the Rshis reached a certain point in their meditation they ALL saw the same things.One should agree that when even the most intelligent scientists draws certain conclusions from facts he has observed ,and those conclusions pertain to an area which is beyond the normal human range,then his conclusions remain mere speculations. Darwin happened to observe certain species in certain islands and drew certain conclusions.He did not observe ALL the species in the entire universe.And even if he had done so it would only have given him the actual position as it exists today.Any theory he developed regarding what could have happened millions of year ago,is still just a theory.On the other hand we have the words of those to whom the Lord actually showed what really happened then.We have His own words in the Gita,we have Sri EmberumAnAr's words in his works.Which of these would one consider as the ? As was observed in one of the letters,accepting Darwin's theory is tantamount to treating all SRuti-Smriti-PurANa accounts of creation as myths.As I had mentioned earlier these accounts do not consider creation as occuring in various time-slots,each slot featuring only one type of creature.In the beginning of creation ALL creatures are created simultaneously for a very important reason: Creation is the only method by which the soul can reap the fruit of its past Karma and also move up or down the scale.In such a situation if only fish existed for a million years and then only birds etc what will be the fate of the Karma-system and the statements of Bhattar etc.Our AchAryas repeat endlessly that creation is the means through which the mercy of the Lord is shown,to give the bound souls a means to reach Him. Hence I feel Darwin's theory is clearly contrary to the ViSishTAdwaita philosophy. SwAmi EmberumAnAr TiruvaDigaLE Saranam! adiyEn Bharat
- Next message: B N SURESH 's ACCOUNT: "stotraratna contd. 13 through 16."
- Previous message: sudarshan madabushi: "discussions on darwin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]